Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37644655›Full record

ReviewQuarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)2024

The influence of the design of mental rotation trials on performance and possible differences between sexes: A theoretical review and experimental investigation.

Leonardo Jost, Petra Jansen

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Degraded Visibility Body-Specifically Affects Mental Rotation.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Leonardo JostFaculty of Human Sciences, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3508-4315
Petra JansenFaculty of Human Sciences, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
University of Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex differences in mental rotation performance are one of the largest in cognitive psychology. Men outperform women by up to 1

Indexed as

Space PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansImaginationMaleMiddle AgedResearch DesignRotationSex FactorsMental rotationmultiple choicesex differencestest design

Identifiers

PMID37644655
PMCPMC11103899
OpenAlexW4386271999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.