Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37644599›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering online2023

Which are best for successful aging prediction? Bagging, boosting, or simple machine learning algorithms?

Razieh Mirzaeian, Raoof Nopour, Zahra Asghari Varzaneh, Mohsen Shafiee, Mostafa Shanbehzadeh, Hadi Kazemi-Arpanahi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A novel explainable machine learning-based healthy ageing scale.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Razieh MirzaeianDepartment of Health Information Management, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0530-0232
Raoof NopourStudent Research Committee, School of Health Management and Information Sciences Branch, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3770-2375
Zahra Asghari VarzanehDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3173-6849
Mohsen ShafieeDepartment of Nursing, Abadan University of Medical Sciences, Abadan, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9511-585X
Mostafa ShanbehzadehDepartment of Health Information Technology, School of Paramedical, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3419-1947
Hadi Kazemi-ArpanahiDepartment of Health Information Technology, Abadan University of Medical Sciences, Abadan, Iran. h.kazemi@abadanums.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8882-5765
Hamedan University of Medical Sciences · IRIran University of Medical Sciences · IRMedical University of Ilam · IRShahid Bahonar University of Kerman · IRShahrekord University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of Ibadan · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe worldwide society is currently facing an epidemiological shift due to the significant improvement in life expectancy and increase in the elderly population. This shift requires the public and scientific community to highlight successful aging (SA), as an indicator representing the quality of elderly people's health. SA is a subjective, complex, and multidimensional concept; thus, its meaning or measuring is a difficult task. This study seeks to identify the most affecting factors on SA and fed them as input variables for constructing predictive models using machine learning (ML) algorithms.

methodsData from 1465 adults aged ≥ 60 years who were referred to health centers in Abadan city (Iran) between 2021 and 2022 were collected by interview. First, binary logistic regression (BLR) was used to identify the main factors influencing SA. Second, eight ML algorithms, including adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), bootstrap aggregating (Bagging), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XG-Boost), random forest (RF), J-48, multilayered perceptron (MLP), Naïve Bayes (NB), and support vector machine (SVM), were trained to predict SA. Finally, their performance was evaluated using metrics derived from the confusion matrix to determine the best model.

resultsThe experimental results showed that 44 factors had a meaningful relationship with SA as the output class. In total, the RF algorithm with sensitivity = 0.95 ± 0.01, specificity = 0.94 ± 0.01, accuracy = 0.94 ± 0.005, and F-score = 0.94 ± 0.003 yielded the best performance for predicting SA.

conclusionsCompared to other selected ML methods, the effectiveness of the RF as a bagging algorithm in predicting SA was significantly better. Our developed prediction models can provide, gerontologists, geriatric nursing, healthcare administrators, and policymakers with a reliable and responsive tool to improve elderly outcomes.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsRandom ForestAdultAgedAgingBayes TheoremHumansMachine LearningAgedData miningHealth-related quality of lifeMachine learningQuality of lifeSuccessful aging

Identifiers

PMID37644599
PMCPMC10463617
OpenAlexW4386251421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.