Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37644543›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2023

Interpretable machine-learning model for Predicting the Convalescent COVID-19 patients with pulmonary diffusing capacity impairment.

Fu-Qiang Ma, Cong He, Hao-Ran Yang, Zuo-Wei Hu, He-Rong Mao, Cun-Yu Fan, Yu Qi, Ji-Xian Zhang, Bo Xu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Fu-Qiang Ma *Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, 430065, China.
Cong He *Hubei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, 430061, China.
Hao-Ran Yang *School of Software, HuaZhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, China.
Zuo-Wei HuWuhan No.1 Hospital, Wuhan, 430022, China.
He-Rong MaoHubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, 430065, China.
Cun-Yu FanHubei Provincial Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Wuhan, 430015, China.
Yu QiHubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, 430065, China.
Ji-Xian ZhangHubei Provincial Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Wuhan, 430015, China. jxzhang1607@163.com.
Bo XuHubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, 430065, China. xubo20191207@126.com.
Hubei University of Chinese Medicine · CNHuazhong University of Science and Technology · CNHubei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNIntegrated Chinese Medicine (China) · CNWuhan City Chinese Medicine Hospital · CNWuhan No.1 Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe COVID-19 patients in the convalescent stage noticeably have pulmonary diffusing capacity impairment (PDCI). The pulmonary diffusing capacity is a frequently-used indicator of the COVID-19 survivors' prognosis of pulmonary function, but the current studies focusing on prediction of the pulmonary diffusing capacity of these people are limited. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a machine learning (ML) model for predicting PDCI in the COVID-19 patients using routinely available clinical data, thus assisting the clinical diagnosis.

methodsCollected from a follow-up study from August to September 2021 of 221 hospitalized survivors of COVID-19 18 months after discharge from Wuhan, including the demographic characteristics and clinical examination, the data in this study were randomly separated into a training (80%) data set and a validation (20%) data set. Six popular machine learning models were developed to predict the pulmonary diffusing capacity of patients infected with COVID-19 in the recovery stage. The performance indicators of the model included area under the curve (AUC), Accuracy, Recall, Precision, Positive Predictive Value(PPV), Negative Predictive Value (NPV) and F1. The model with the optimum performance was defined as the optimal model, which was further employed in the interpretability analysis. The MAHAKIL method was utilized to balance the data and optimize the balance of sample distribution, while the RFECV method for feature selection was utilized to select combined features more favorable to machine learning.

resultsA total of 221 COVID-19 survivors were recruited in this study after discharge from hospitals in Wuhan. Of these participants, 117 (52.94%) were female, with a median age of 58.2 years (standard deviation (SD) = 12). After feature selection, 31 of the 37 clinical factors were finally selected for use in constructing the model. Among the six tested ML models, the best performance was accomplished in the XGBoost model, with an AUC of 0.755 and an accuracy of 78.01% after experimental verification. The SHAPELY Additive explanations (SHAP) summary analysis exhibited that hemoglobin (Hb), maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV), severity of illness, platelet (PLT), Uric Acid (UA) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) were the top six most important factors affecting the XGBoost model decision-making.

conclusionThe XGBoost model reported here showed a good prognostic prediction ability for PDCI of COVID-19 survivors during the recovery period. Among the interpretation methods based on the importance of SHAP values, Hb and MVV contributed the most to the prediction of PDCI outcomes of COVID-19 survivors in the recovery period.

Indexed as

COVID-19Pulmonary Diffusing CapacityArea Under CurveFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedCOVID-19Interpretable artificial intelligenceMachine learningMaximal voluntary ventilationPulmonary diffusing capacity impairment

Identifiers

PMID37644543
PMCPMC10466769
OpenAlexW4386246422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.