Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37644440›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2023

A knowledge graph approach to predict and interpret disease-causing gene interactions.

Alexandre Renaux, Chloé Terwagne, Michael Cochez, Ilaria Tiddi, Ann Nowé, Tom Lenaerts

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Benchmark of computational methods to detect digenism in sequencing data.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Leveraging Social Determinants of Health in Alzheimer's Research Using LLM-Augmented Literature Mining and Knowledge Graphs.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexandre RenauxInteruniversity Institute of Bioinformatics in Brussels, Université Libre de Bruxelles - Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium. Alexandre.Renaux@ulb.be.
Chloé TerwagneInteruniversity Institute of Bioinformatics in Brussels, Université Libre de Bruxelles - Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Michael CochezComputer Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ilaria TiddiComputer Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ann NowéInteruniversity Institute of Bioinformatics in Brussels, Université Libre de Bruxelles - Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Tom LenaertsInteruniversity Institute of Bioinformatics in Brussels, Université Libre de Bruxelles - Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium. tom.lenaerts@ulb.be.
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BEVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

European Regional Development Fund 27.002.53.01.4524Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS 35276964Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek I002819NHorizon 2020 952215HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme 101093202Innoviris 2020 RDIR 55bVrije Universiteit Brussel IRP8b
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding the impact of gene interactions on disease phenotypes is increasingly recognised as a crucial aspect of genetic disease research. This trend is reflected by the growing amount of clinical research on oligogenic diseases, where disease manifestations are influenced by combinations of variants on a few specific genes. Although statistical machine-learning methods have been developed to identify relevant genetic variant or gene combinations associated with oligogenic diseases, they rely on abstract features and black-box models, posing challenges to interpretability for medical experts and impeding their ability to comprehend and validate predictions. In this work, we present a novel, interpretable predictive approach based on a knowledge graph that not only provides accurate predictions of disease-causing gene interactions but also offers explanations for these results.

resultsWe introduce BOCK, a knowledge graph constructed to explore disease-causing genetic interactions, integrating curated information on oligogenic diseases from clinical cases with relevant biomedical networks and ontologies. Using this graph, we developed a novel predictive framework based on heterogenous paths connecting gene pairs. This method trains an interpretable decision set model that not only accurately predicts pathogenic gene interactions, but also unveils the patterns associated with these diseases. A unique aspect of our approach is its ability to offer, along with each positive prediction, explanations in the form of subgraphs, revealing the specific entities and relationships that led to each pathogenic prediction.

conclusionOur method, built with interpretability in mind, leverages heterogenous path information in knowledge graphs to predict pathogenic gene interactions and generate meaningful explanations. This not only broadens our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying oligogenic diseases, but also presents a novel application of knowledge graphs in creating more transparent and insightful predictors for genetic research.

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticPattern Recognition, AutomatedGene OntologyMachine LearningPhenotypeDisease geneticsGenetic interactionsInterpretable machine-learningKnowledge graphs

Identifiers

PMID37644440
PMCPMC10463539
OpenAlexW4386254278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.