ArticleBMC bioinformatics2023
A knowledge graph approach to predict and interpret disease-causing gene interactions.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Benchmarking knowledge graph embedding models for the prediction of oligogenic combinations.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- A multimodal vision knowledge graph of cardiovascular disease.Nature cardiovascular research · 2026Article
- Application of knowledge graphs in rare disease research.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- A novel computational analysis integrating social determinants information from EHR and literature with Alzheimer's disease biological knowledge through large language models and knowledge graphs.Innovation in aging · 2025Article
- Benchmark of computational methods to detect digenism in sequencing data.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Review
- KG2ML: integrating knowledge graphs and positive unlabeled learning for identifying disease-associated genes.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Leveraging Social Determinants of Health in Alzheimer's Research Using LLM-Augmented Literature Mining and Knowledge Graphs.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2025Article
- Knowledge graph and its application in the study of neurological and mental disorders.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Review
- Prioritization of oligogenic variant combinations in whole exomes.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Strategies for dissecting the complexity of neurodevelopmental disorders.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2024Review
- AgeAnnoMO: a knowledgebase of multi-omics annotation for animal aging.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- DOME Registry: implementing community-wide recommendations for reporting supervised machine learning in biology.GigaScience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding the impact of gene interactions on disease phenotypes is increasingly recognised as a crucial aspect of genetic disease research. This trend is reflected by the growing amount of clinical research on oligogenic diseases, where disease manifestations are influenced by combinations of variants on a few specific genes. Although statistical machine-learning methods have been developed to identify relevant genetic variant or gene combinations associated with oligogenic diseases, they rely on abstract features and black-box models, posing challenges to interpretability for medical experts and impeding their ability to comprehend and validate predictions. In this work, we present a novel, interpretable predictive approach based on a knowledge graph that not only provides accurate predictions of disease-causing gene interactions but also offers explanations for these results.
resultsWe introduce BOCK, a knowledge graph constructed to explore disease-causing genetic interactions, integrating curated information on oligogenic diseases from clinical cases with relevant biomedical networks and ontologies. Using this graph, we developed a novel predictive framework based on heterogenous paths connecting gene pairs. This method trains an interpretable decision set model that not only accurately predicts pathogenic gene interactions, but also unveils the patterns associated with these diseases. A unique aspect of our approach is its ability to offer, along with each positive prediction, explanations in the form of subgraphs, revealing the specific entities and relationships that led to each pathogenic prediction.
conclusionOur method, built with interpretability in mind, leverages heterogenous path information in knowledge graphs to predict pathogenic gene interactions and generate meaningful explanations. This not only broadens our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying oligogenic diseases, but also presents a novel application of knowledge graphs in creating more transparent and insightful predictors for genetic research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.