Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37644407›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2023

System interventions to support rural access to maternity care: an analysis of the rural surgical obstetrical networks program.

Jude Kornelsen, Stephanie Lin, Kim Williams, Tom Skinner, Sean Ebert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Article
  10. Optimizing postpartum care in Canada as rates of comorbidity in pregnancy rise.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Evaluating the scope of rural general surgery in British Columbia.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jude KornelsenCentre for Rural Health Research, Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, 5950 University Boulevard, 3rd Floor David Strangway Building, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T1Z3, Canada. jude.kornelsen@familymed.ubc.ca.
Stephanie LinFaculty of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Kim WilliamsRural Coordination Centre of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Tom SkinnerRural Coordination Centre of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Sean EbertRural Coordination Centre of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Funding

Joint Standing Committee on Rural Issues R005415
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Rural Surgical Obstetrical Networks (RSON) project was developed in response to the persistent attrition of rural maternity services across Canada over the past two decades. While other research has demonstrated the adverse health and psychosocial consequences of losing local maternity services, this paper explores the impact of a program designed to increase the sustainability of rural services themselves, through the funding of four "pillars": increased scope and volume, clinical coaching, continuous quality improvement (CQI) and remote presence technology.

methodsWe conducted in-depth, qualitative research interviews with rural health care providers and administrators in eight rural communities across British Columbia to understand the impact of the RSON program on maternity services. Researchers used thematic analysis to generate common themes across the dataset and interpret findings.

findingsParticipants articulated six themes regarding the sustainability of maternity care as actualized through the RSON project: safety and quality through quality improvement opportunities, improved access to care through increased surgical volume and OR backup, optimized team function through innovative models of care, improved infrastructure, local innovation surrounding workforce shortages, and locally tailored funding models.

conclusionRural maternity sites benefited from the funding offered through the RSON pillars, as demonstrated by larger volumes of local deliveries, nearly unanimous positive accounts of the interventions by health care providers, and evidence of staffing stability during the study time frame. As such, the interventions provided through the Rural Surgical Obstetrical Networks project as well as study findings on the common themes of sustainable maternity care should be considered when planning core rural health services funding schemes.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesAdministrative PersonnelBritish ColumbiaFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansPregnancyRural PopulationHealth service planningHealth services accessibilityQualitative researchRural healthRural maternity care

Identifiers

PMID37644407
PMCPMC10466771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.