Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37644405›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2023

Gut microbiome causal impacts on the prognosis of breast cancer: a Mendelian randomization study.

Weimin Hong, Guoxin Huang, Danhong Wang, Yadan Xu, Jie Qiu, Bin Pei, Da Qian, Xuli Meng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Weimin Hong *General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Breast Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310000, China.
Guoxin Huang *Department of Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Xiangyang No.1 People's Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Xiangyang, 441000, China.
Danhong Wang *College of Pharmacy, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China.
Yadan XuGeneral Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Breast Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310000, China.
Jie QiuGeneral Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Breast Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310000, China.
Bin PeiDepartment of Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Xiangyang No.1 People's Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Xiangyang, 441000, China. binpei@hbmu.edu.cn.
Da QianDepartment of Burn and Plastic Surgery-Hand Surgery, Changshu Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University Changshu No 1 People's Hospital, Changshu, 215500, China. drqianda@hotmail.com.
Xuli MengGeneral Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Breast Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310000, China. mxlmail@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGrowing evidence has shown that gut microbiome composition is associated with breast cancer (BC), but the causality remains unknown. We aimed to investigate the link between BC prognosis and the gut microbiome at various oestrogen receptor (ER) statuses.

methodsWe performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) to analyse the gut microbiome of BC patients, the dataset for which was collected by the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC). The analysis was executed mainly via inverse variance weighting (IVW); the Mendelian randomization (MR) results were verified by heterogeneity tests, sensitivity analysis, and pleiotropy analysis.

resultsOur findings identified nine causal relationships between the gut microbiome and total BC cases, with ten and nine causal relationships between the gut microbiome and ER-negative (ER-) and ER-positive (ER+) BC, respectively. The family Ruminococcaceae and genus Parabacteroides were most apparent among the three categories. Moreover, the genus Desulfovibrio was expressed in ER- BC and total BC, whereas the genera Sellimonas, Adlercreutzia and Rikenellaceae appeared in the relationship between ER + BC and total BC.

conclusionOur MR inquiry confirmed that the gut microbiota is causally related to BC. This further explains the link between specific bacteria for prognosis of BC at different ER statuses. Considering that potential weak instrument bias impacts the findings and that the results are limited to European females due to data constraints, further validation is crucial.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeBacteroidetesEubacterialesFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMendelian Randomization AnalysisPrognosisReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, EstrogenBreast cancerGut microbiomeMendelian randomization studyOestrogen receptor status

Identifiers

PMID37644405
PMCPMC10464481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.