ArticleBMC infectious diseases2023
Molecular investigations of Mycobacterium tuberculosis genotypes among baseline and follow-up strains circulating in four regions of Eswatini.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Conserved neutrophil degranulation transcripts in HIV-TB coinfected children across East and Southern Africa.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Epidemiological changes in tuberculosis and genotyping characteristics ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe tuberculosis (TB) epidemic remains a major global health problem and Eswatini is not excluded. Our study investigated the circulating genotypes in Eswatini and compared them at baseline (start of treatment) and follow-up during TB treatment.
methodsThree hundred and ninety (n = 390) participants were prospectively enrolled from referral clinics and patients who met the inclusion criteria, were included in the study. A total of 103 participants provided specimens at baseline and follow-up within six months. Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb) strains were detected by GeneXpert® MTB/RIF assay (Cephied, USA) and Ziehl -Neelsen (ZN) microscopy respectively at baseline and follow-up time-points respectively. The 206 collected specimens were decontaminated and cultured on BACTEC™ MGIT™ 960 Mycobacteria Culture System (Becton Dickinson, USA). Drug sensitivity testing was performed at both baseline and follow-up time points. Spoligotyping was performed on both baseline and follow-up strains after DNA extraction.
resultsResistance to at least one first line drug was detected higher at baseline compared to follow-up specimens with most of them developing into multidrug-resistant (MDR)-TB. A total of four lineages and twenty genotypes were detected. The distribution of the lineages varied among the different regions in Eswatini. The Euro-American lineage was the most prevalent with 46.12% (95/206) followed by the East Asian with 24.27% (50/206); Indo-Oceanic at 9.71% (20/206) and Central Asian at 1.94% (4/206). Furthermore, a high proportion of the Beijing genotype at 24.27% (50/206) and S genotype at 16.50% (34/206) were detected. The Beijing genotype was predominant in follow-up specimens collected from the Manzini region with 48.9% (23/47) (p = 0.001). A significant proportion of follow-up specimens developed MDR-TB (p = 0.001) with Beijing being the major genotype in most follow-up specimens (p < 0.000).
conclusionEswatini has a high M.tb genotypic diversity. A significant proportion of the TB infected participants had the Beijing genotype associated with MDR-TB in follow-up specimens and thus indicate community wide transmission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.