Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37644337›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2023

Development and validation of core entrustable professional activities for abdominal radiology.

Anita Paisant, Stephen Skehan, Mathilde Colombié, Arthur David, Christophe Aubé

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anita PaisantDepartment of Radiology, Abdominal Unit Radiologie A, Angers University Hospital, 4 Rue Larrey, 49933, Angers, France. anita.paisant@chu-angers.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0308-2833
Stephen SkehanDepartment of Radiology, Elm Park Dublin 4 and School of Medicine, St Vincent's University Hospital, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Mathilde ColombiéDepartment of Radiology, Elm Park Dublin 4 and School of Medicine, St Vincent's University Hospital, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Arthur DavidDepartment of Radiology, Nantes University Hospital, Hôtel Dieu, 1 Pl. Alexis-Ricordeau, 44093, Nantes Cedex 1, France.
Christophe AubéDepartment of Radiology, Abdominal Unit Radiologie A, Angers University Hospital, 4 Rue Larrey, 49933, Angers, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop and validate European entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for sub-specialised hepatobiliary and gastrointestinal (HB/GI) diagnostic imaging. MATERIALS AND

methodsBoth European Society of Radiology and national curricula in HB/GI diagnostic radiology were thoroughly reviewed, resulting in preliminary EPAs drafted by a pilot group of expert radiologists in 2 different countries. Each EPA was fully described with 7 components (Specification/limitations; Potential risks of failing; Relevant domains of competence; Required experience, knowledge, skills, attitude and behaviour; Assessment information sources to assess progress and ground a summative entrustment decision; Entrustment for which level of supervision is to be reached; and Expiration date). The modified Delphi method with 3 Delphi rounds was chosen for validation. Content validity index (CVI) and median values were used for validation.

resultsThere were 15 preliminary EPAs, some of them divided according to 2 levels: resident and fellow level. The 37 members of the Delphi group were based in 2 different European countries with a background experience of 10 represented countries. Subsequent to the first Delphi round, 6 EPAs were accepted (CVI ≥ 0.8, median ≥ 4), 6 needed major revisions (CVI 0.7-0.79, median ≥ 4), 3 were rejected (CVI < 0.7) and 1 was added. After the second Delphi round, both the 6 revised EPAs and the additional one met the validation criteria (CVI ≥ 0.8, median ≥ 4). Finally, 13 EPAs were validated during the 3

conclusionThis study creates and validates EPAs for sub-specialised HB/GI diagnostic imaging. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Thirteen EPAs for sub-specialised hepatobiliary and gastrointestinal diagnostic imaging were created with a strong methodology, and as a first example set in sub-specialised diagnostic imaging, they provide a template for others to be created. KEY POINTS: • The competence-based teaching in medical studies has recently been reintroduced through EPAs. • Thirteen EPAs have been developed for hepatobiliary and gastrointestinal sub-specialised diagnostic imaging. • These EPAs were validated using a Delphi modified method and provide a template for other to be created.

Indexed as

Competency-based educationCurriculumDiagnostic imagingDigestive system diseaseEducation

Identifiers

PMID37644337
PMCPMC10465426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.