ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2023
Maximal performance of intact N-glycopeptide enrichment using sequential HILIC and MAX columns.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proteogenomics: decoding cancer in multiple dimensions.MedScience · 2026Review
- Comparative Analysis of Lysis Buffers for Enhanced Proteomic and Glycoproteomic Profiling.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- A comprehensive N-glycoproteome atlas reveals tissue-specific glycan remodeling but non-random structural microheterogeneities.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Integrated multi-omics atlas reveals PTM-driven signaling and immunologic remodeling in a mouse model of age-related subclinical hypothyroidism.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Improving Glycoproteomic Analysis Workflow by Systematic Evaluation of Glycopeptide Enrichment, Quantification, Mass Spectrometry Approach, and Data Analysis Strategies.Analytical chemistry · 2024Article
- Optimization of glycopeptide enrichment techniques for the identification of clinical biomarkers.Expert review of proteomics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Low abundance and heterogeneity of N-glycosylation at the peptide level poses a great challenge to the structural and functional analysis of glycosylation in the field of glycobiology. Solving this conundrum requires a sufficient and specific method for intact N-glycopeptide enrichment. Using the C18 or HLB desalting column followed by the mixed-mode strong anion exchange (MAX) or hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) glycopeptide enrichment column are commonly applied approaches for sample preparation of intact N-glycopeptides from complex samples. Herein, we compared the effects of different combinations of two desalting columns and two enrichment columns using equal amounts of mouse brain tissues from the same source. The results revealed the C18 column was a bit superior to the HLB column, and the MAX and HILIC columns were complementary on intact N-glycopeptides enrichment. Additionally, the results also demonstrated that enriching glycopeptides using a HILIC column followed by a MAX column from the flow-through solution got a better enrichment performance than the reversed order. Based on these results, the sequential enrichment of glycopeptides using HILIC and then MAX columns could maximize the enrichment performance of intact N-glycopeptides, and therefore is an option for in-depth analysis of site-specific glycoproteome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37644321What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.