Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37644237›Full record

SynthesisVeterinary research communications2024

Protective effects of feed additives on broiler chickens exposed to aflatoxins-contaminated feed: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Reza Pratama Putra, Dian Astuti, Adib Norma Respati, Niati Ningsih, Triswanto, Aan Andri Yano, Besse Mahbuba We Tenri Gading, Anuraga Jayanegara, Mohammad Miftakhus Sholikin, Hasliza Abu Hassim and 3 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Veterinary research communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Reza Pratama PutraDepartment of Agriculture and Horticulture, Province of Jambi, Jambi, 36122, Indonesia.
Dian AstutiAgrotechnology Innovation Center, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Sleman, 55573, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3304-3520
Adib Norma RespatiDepartment of Animal Science, Politeknik Negeri Jember, Jember, 68101, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6311-8661
Niati NingsihDepartment of Animal Science, Politeknik Negeri Jember, Jember, 68101, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8140-4714
TriswantoDepartment of Feed Technology, PT. Charoen Pokphand Indonesia, Jakarta Utara, 14350, Indonesia.
Aan Andri YanoVocational School, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, 57126, Indonesia.
Besse Mahbuba We Tenri GadingDepartment of Animal Science, Universitas Sulawesi Barat, Majene, Indonesia.
Anuraga JayanegaraDepartment of Nutrition and Feed Technology, Faculty of Animal Science, IPB University, Bogor, 16680, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7529-9770
Mohammad Miftakhus SholikinAnimal Feed and Nutrition Modelling (AFENUE) Research Group, Faculty of Animal Science, IPB University, Bogor, 16680, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8677-6982
Hasliza Abu HassimDepartment of Veterinary Preclinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Food Security Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang, Selangor, 43400, Malaysia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7119-6560
Amirul Faiz Mohd AzmiDepartment of Veterinary Preclinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Food Security Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang, Selangor, 43400, Malaysia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4801-0542
Danung Nur AdliFaculty of Animal Science, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, 65145, Indonesia.
Agung IrawanVocational School, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, 57126, Indonesia. a.irawan@staff.uns.ac.id.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1179-0469
Sebelas Maret University · IDUniversitas Jember · IDUniversiti Putra Malaysia · MYBandung Institute of Technology · IDIPB University · IDJambi University · IDUniversitas Gadjah Mada · IDUniversitas Sulawesi Barat · IDUniversity of Brawijaya · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aflatoxin contamination in feed is a common problem in broiler chickens. The present systematic review and meta-analysis examined the impact of aflatoxin-contaminated feed and the efficacy of various feed additives on the production performance of broiler chickens fed aflatoxin-contaminated feed (AF-feed). A total of 35 studies comprising 53 AF-feed experiments were selected following PRISMA guidelines. Feed additives included in the analyses were toxins binder (TB), mannan-oligosaccharides (MOS), organic acid (OA), probiotics (PRO), protein supplementation (PROT), phytobiotics (PHY), and additive mixture (MIX). Random effects model and a frequentist network meta-analysis (NMA) were performed to rank the efficacy of feed additives, reported as standardized means difference (SMD) at 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Overall, broiler chickens fed AF-feed had significantly lower final body weight (BW) (SMD = 198; 95% CI = 198 to 238) and higher feed conversion ratio (SMD = 0.17; 95% CI = 0.13 to 0.21) than control. Treatments with TB, MOS, and PHY improved the BW of birds fed AF-feed (P < 0.05) to be comparable with non-contaminated feed or control. Predictions on final BW from the broiler-fed aflatoxin-contaminated diet were 15% lower than the control diet. Including feed additives in the aflatoxins diet could ameliorate the depressive effect. Remarkably, our network meta-analysis highlighted that TB was the highest-performing additive (P-score = 0.797) to remedy aflatoxicosis. Altogether, several additives, especially TB, are promising to ameliorate aflatoxicosis in broiler chickens, although the efficacy was low regarding the severity of the aflatoxicosis.

Indexed as

AflatoxinsAnimal FeedAnimalsChickensDietProbioticsWeight GainAflatoxinsAflatoxin B1Broiler chickensFeed additiveFeed contaminationNetwork meta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID37644237
OpenAlexW4386244441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.