Trial reportJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023
Prognostic analysis and treatment utilization of different treatment strategies in elderly esophageal cancer patients with distant metastases: a SEER database analysis.
Trial report in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical characteristics, prognosis, and nomogram for upper esophageal cancer: a SEER database analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a prognostic model for patients with cT1-4N1-3M1 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: based on the SEER database and the Chinese cohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to explore which therapeutic strategy is more beneficial for elderly esophageal cancer (EC) patients with distant metastasis, the treatment utilization status and the screening of factors related to prognosis, so as to better guide the treatment of these patients.
methodsPatients in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database were divided into chemoradiotherapy (Group A), chemotherapy (Group B), radiotherapy (Group C), and no treatment (Group D) according to different treatment methods. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to adjust for baseline differences between the two groups. Overall survival (OS) and esophageal cancer-specific survival (ECSS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test.
resultsA total of 7027 patients were included in this study, 5739 males (81.7%) and 1288 females (18.3%) with the median age was 70 (60-98). In the original cohort, the number of patients in the four groups was 2260 (Group A), 2087 (Group B), 945 (Group C) and 1735 (Group D), respectively. After PSM, there was no significant difference in mean OS (A vs B, 13.5 months VS 13.4 months, P = 0.511) and mean ECSS (A vs B, 15.6 vs 15.5 months, P = 0.374), while both OS (B vs C, 7 vs 3 months, P < 0.001) and ECSS (B vs C, 8 vs 3 months, P < 0.001) of chemotherapy alone were significantly better than those of radiotherapy alone. Subgroup analysis of patients older than 80 years showed that the median OS (A vs B, 7 vs 6 months) and median ECSS (A vs B, 8 vs 7 months) of Group A were significantly better than those of Group B (P < 0.05). In addition, all patients were randomly divided into a training set and a validation set with a ratio of 7:3. Based on the independent risk factors for OS, a nomogram model was constructed and validated.
conclusionFor elderly EC patients with distant metastasis, aggressive treatment was still necessary after a comprehensive assessment of the patient's physical condition, especially for patients over 80 years old, and chemoradiotherapy maybe still the first choice. In addition, a nomogram model was constructed to intuitively and accurately evaluate the prognosis of this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.