Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37644033›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Feasibility of an implantable bioreactor for renal cell therapy using silicon nanopore membranes.

Eun Jung Kim, Caressa Chen, Rebecca Gologorsky, Ana Santandreu, Alonso Torres, Nathan Wright, Mark S Goodin, Jarrett Moyer, Benjamin W Chui, Charles Blaha and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Contemporary Perspectives on Chronic Renal Disorders.Chronic diseases and translational medicine · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Advances in Human-Centered Care to Address Contemporary Unmet Needs in Chronic Dialysis.International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eun Jung Kim *University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Caressa Chen *University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Rebecca GologorskyUniversity of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Ana SantandreuUniversity of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Alonso TorresUniversity of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Nathan WrightUniversity of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Mark S GoodinSimuTech Group, Rochester, NY, USA.
Jarrett MoyerUniversity of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Benjamin W ChuiUniversity of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Charles BlahaUniversity of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Paul BrakemanUniversity of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Shant VartanianUniversity of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Qizhi TangUniversity of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7313-3574
H David HumesUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
William H FissellSilicon Kidney LLC, San Ramon, CA, USA.
Shuvo RoyUniversity of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. shuvo.roy@ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3236-6336
University of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Michigan · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Building an Implantable Artificial KidneyU01EB021214 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FISSELL, WILLIAM H, ROY, SHUVO · 2015 to 2018
$6.0M
R25EB023856 Supplement LeeYM P0546225R25EB023856 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LEE, HANMIN, ROY, SHUVO · 2017 to 2021
$698k
FDA HHS P50 FD006424NIBIB NIH HHS R25 EB023856NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB021214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The definitive treatment for end-stage renal disease is kidney transplantation, which remains limited by organ availability and post-transplant complications. Alternatively, an implantable bioartificial kidney could address both problems while enhancing the quality and length of patient life. An implantable bioartificial kidney requires a bioreactor containing renal cells to replicate key native cell functions, such as water and solute reabsorption, and metabolic and endocrinologic functions. Here, we report a proof-of-concept implantable bioreactor containing silicon nanopore membranes to offer a level of immunoprotection to human renal epithelial cells. After implantation into pigs without systemic anticoagulation or immunosuppression therapy for 7 days, we show that cells maintain >90% viability and functionality, with normal or elevated transporter gene expression and vitamin D activation. Despite implantation into a xenograft model, we find that cells exhibit minimal damage, and recipient cytokine levels are not suggestive of hyperacute rejection. These initial data confirm the potential feasibility of an implantable bioreactor for renal cell therapy utilizing silicon nanopore membranes.

Indexed as

NanoporesSiliconAnimalsBioreactorsCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyEpithelial CellsFeasibility StudiesHumansKidneySwineSilicon

Identifiers

PMID37644033
PMCPMC10465514
OpenAlexW4386254565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.