SynthesisNeurology2023
Clinical Characteristics Associated With Secondary Generalization in Patients With Ocular Myasthenia Gravis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gender differences in Myasthenia Gravis in a neuromuscular reference center in Belgium.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2026Article
- Women and Myasthenia Gravis.Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology · 2026Article
- Case Report: Use of telitacicept for ocular myasthenia gravis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Factors Influencing the Conversion of Ocular Myasthenia Gravis to Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Comparative study of ocular and generalized myasthenia gravis in a South Korean cohort.PloS one · 2026Article
- Interconnection between myasthenia gravis and type 2 diabetes: emerging role of metformin in modulating PI3K/AKT/mTOR/AMPK axis.Metabolic brain disease · 2025Review
- Factors associated with increased severity of generalized myasthenia gravis among patients in the United States and Europe.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Validation and clinical utility of OMGRate and MG-QOL15 in evaluating symptoms and quality of life in Chinese patients with ocular myasthenia gravis.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
- Risk factors for disease generalization in acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive ocular myasthenia: a multicenter retrospective study.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesOcular myasthenia gravis (OMG) is an autoimmune disorder resulting in ocular symptoms such as diplopia and ptosis. The proportion of patients who convert to secondary generalized myasthenia gravis (SGMG) reported in the literature has been varied. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the clinical characteristics of patients with OMG and the proportion of SGMG conversion.
methodsWe conducted an electronic database search for randomized controlled trials, prospective nonrandomized studies, observational studies, and retrospective studies in EMBASE, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Web of Science. We included studies with patients with OMG who initially presented with ocular symptoms and signs only and were seen in clinical practice, reporting on the characteristics and outcomes of SGMG. We excluded studies with pediatric and congenital myasthenia gravis populations. Eligible studies included articles written in any language and containing data on patients with OMG. The main outcome measured was the proportion of patients with OMG who converted to SGMG and risk factors associated with secondary generalization of OMG. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts and extracted data from full texts, reporting findings according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The methodology was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal forms. PROSPERO registration number: CRD2021285257.
resultsThirty-one studies were included in the quantitative and qualitative analysis. The proportion of generalization ranged from 11% to 84%. The pooled proportion was 39% (95% CI 32%-47%, DISCUSSION: Risk factors such as female sex and anti-AChR positivity have been identified to have possible associations with SGMG, but there are not enough quality observational studies. There is a need for a prospective global database of patients with OMG, including all countries with different populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.