Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37643864›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2023

Excitatory and Inhibitory Signaling in the Nucleus Accumbens Encode Different Aspects of a Pavlovian Cue in Sign Tracking and Goal Tracking Rats.

Kyle Duffer, Zachary S Gillis, Sara E Morrison

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Modulation of Dopamine Neurons Alters Behavior and Event Encoding in the Nucleus Accumbens during Pavlovian Conditioning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  4. Distinct Action Signals by Subregions in the Nucleus Accumbens during STOP-Change Performance.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kyle DufferDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260.
Zachary S GillisDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260.
Sara E MorrisonDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 sara.morrison@pitt.edu.
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Neural Mechanisms of Habit Formation for Behaviors Motivated by Drugs of Abuse and Natural RewardK01DA051662 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MORRISON, SARA · 2020 to 2024
$709k
Neural circuitry underlying individual differences in cue-driven reward-seeking behaviorR03DA045913 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MORRISON, SARA · 2019 to 2020
$157k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA051662NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA045913
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When a Pavlovian cue is presented separately from its associated reward, some animals will acquire a sign tracking (ST) response - approach and/or interaction with the cue - while others will acquire a goal tracking response - approach to the site of reward. We have previously shown that cue-evoked excitations in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) encode the vigor of both behaviors; in contrast, reward-related responses diverge over the course of training, possibly reflecting neurochemical differences between sign tracker and goal tracker individuals. However, a substantial subset of neurons in the NAc exhibit inhibitory, rather than excitatory, cue-evoked responses, and the evolution of their signaling during Pavlovian conditioning remains unknown. Using single-neuron recordings in behaving rats, we show that NAc neurons with cue-evoked inhibitions have distinct coding properties from neurons with cue-evoked excitations. Cue-evoked inhibitions become more numerous over the course of training and, like excitations, may encode the vigor of sign tracking and goal tracking behavior. However, the responses of cue-inhibited neurons do not evolve differently between sign tracker and goal tracker individuals. Moreover, cue-evoked inhibitions, unlike excitations, are insensitive to extinction of the cue-reward relationship. Finally, we show that cue-evoked excitations are greatly diminished by reward devaluation, while inhibitory cue responses are virtually unaffected. Overall, these findings converge with existing evidence that cue-excited neurons in NAc, but not cue-inhibited neurons, are profoundly sensitive to the same behavior variations that are often associated with changes in dopamine release.

Indexed as

GoalsNucleus AccumbensAnimalsConditioning, ClassicalDopamineInhibition, PsychologicalRatsDopaminedevaluationextinctionnucleus accumbensPavlovianrewardsign tracking

Identifiers

PMID37643864
PMCPMC10488220
OpenAlexW4386241944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.