Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37643844›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Prediction of violence or threat of violence among employees in social work, healthcare and education: the Finnish Public Sector cohort study.

Jaakko Airaksinen, Jaana Pentti, Piia Seppälä, Marianna Virtanen, Annina Ropponen, Marko Elovainio, Mika Kivimäki, Jenni Ervasti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Jaakko AiraksinenFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland jaakko.airaksinen@ttl.fi.ORCID 0000-0001-7773-7615
Jaana PenttiFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Piia SeppäläFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Marianna VirtanenSchool of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-8361-3301
Annina RopponenFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-3031-5823
Marko ElovainioFinnish Institute of Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-1401-1910
Mika KivimäkiFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Jenni ErvastiFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-9113-2428
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Eastern Finland · FI

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K013351/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop a risk prediction algorithm for identifying work units with increased risk of violence in the workplace.

designProspective cohort study.

settingPublic sector employees in Finland.

participants18 540 nurses, social and youth workers, and teachers from 4276 work units who completed a survey on work characteristics, including prevalence and frequency of workplace violence/threat of violence at baseline in 2018-2019 and at follow-up in 2020-2021. Those who reported daily or weekly exposure to violence or threat of violence daily at baseline were excluded. EXPOSURES: Mean scores of responses to 87 survey items at baseline were calculated for each work unit, and those scores were then assigned to each employee within that work unit. The scores measured sociodemographic characteristics and work characteristics of the work unit. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Increase in workplace violence between baseline and follow-up (0=no increase, 1=increase).

resultsA total of 7% (323/4487) of the registered nurses, 15% (457/3109) of the practical nurses, 5% of the social and youth workers (162/3442) and 5% of the teachers (360/7502) reported more frequent violence/threat of violence at follow-up than at baseline. The area under the curve values estimating the prediction accuracy of the prediction models were 0.72 for social and youth workers, 0.67 for nurses, and 0.63 for teachers. The risk prediction model for registered nurses included five work unit characteristics associated with more frequent violence at follow-up. The model for practical nurses included six characteristics, the model for social and youth workers seven characteristics and the model for teachers included four characteristics statistically significantly associated with higher likelihood of increased violence.

conclusionsThe generated risk prediction models identified employees working in work units with high likelihood of future workplace violence with reasonable accuracy. These survey-based algorithms can be used to target interventions to prevent workplace violence.

Indexed as

Public SectorWorkplace ViolenceAdolescentCohort StudiesDelivery of Health CareFinlandHumansProspective StudiesSocial Workoccupational & industrial medicinepublic healthrisk factorssensitivity and specificitysurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID37643844
PMCPMC10465908
OpenAlexW4386258662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.