ArticleCancer genomics & proteomics
Article in Cancer genomics & proteomics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- pH-triggered Mn-ZIF8 nanoreactor enhances tumor immunotherapy by amplifying the cGAS-STING pathway through a self-reinforcing gas-metal synergy strategy.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimThe immunogenic cell death (ICD) pathway plays a crucial prognostic role in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) therapy. The cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS)-stimulator of interferon genes (STING) pathway is an upstream mechanism that drives ICD activation, but the interaction of hub genes remains unclear. The present study aimed to investigate the hub genes involved in ICD and the cGAS-STING pathway. The prognostic performance for hub genes and related Gene Ontology (GO) terms were also investigated. MATERIALS AND
methodsGene expression data of ICD induction and cGAS-STING pathway activation samples were extracted from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, and gene expression as well as clinical data of LUAD patients who received pharmaceutical therapy were extracted from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified, and protein-protein interaction (PPI) analysis was used to identify hub genes. Hazard risk (HR) scores were identified using Kaplan-Meier (K-M) and COX analyses. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed to identify the related GO terms, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the prognosis performance of the related gene sets.
resultsA total of 22 DEGs were identified in the two GEO datasets, and six hub genes were identified by PPI analysis. Keratin 6A (KRTA6A) and fatty acid 2-hydroxylase (FA2H) were selected as the hub genes after survival analysis. GSEA and ROC analysis indicated that there was no difference between the KRTA6A and FA2H gene sets on prognosis performance.
conclusionKRTA6A and FA2H are hub genes associated with the induction of cGAS-STING-related ICD in LUAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.