Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37643698›Full record

ReviewCurrent problems in cardiology2024

Insight Into the Optimal Timing of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Dae Yong Park, Matheus Simonato, Yousif Ahmad, Adam Z Banks, Angela Lowenstern, Michael G Nanna

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current problems in cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Coronary Artery Disease and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Dae Yong ParkDepartment of Medicine, Cook County Health, Chicago, IL.
Matheus SimonatoDepartment of Medicine, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT.
Yousif AhmadSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Adam Z BanksDivision of Cardiology, Presbyterian Hospital, Albuquerque, NM.
Angela LowensternDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Michael G NannaSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. Electronic address: michael.nanna@yale.edu.
Yale University · USCook County Health and Hospitals System · USPresbyterian Hospital · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · USYale New Haven Hospital · US

Funding

Yale Study Support Suite (YES3): Dashboard and Web Portal Software Supporting Research Workflow through integrated, customizable REDCap External ModulesP30AG021342 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Denise Esserman · 2002 to 2026
$37.9M
Generating novel predictive models to estimate the risk of future ASCVD & Dementia in older adultsR03AG074067 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI NANNA, MICHAEL · 2021 to 2022
$335k
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021342NIA NIH HHS R03 AG074067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients being considered for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are frequently diagnosed with coronary artery disease. In patients requiring revascularization, there is a paucity of data informing when to perform percutaneous coronary artery intervention (PCI). We evaluated the impact of PCI timing on clinical outcomes and readmissions after TAVR. From the National Readmissions Database 2016 to 2019, we stratified the duration between PCI and TAVR into 3 groups: same-day PCI and TAVR, TAVR ≤30 days after PCI, and TAVR >30 days after PCI. We then compared primary and secondary outcomes among them. A total of 5207 patients were included, 1413 (27.1%) of whom underwent PCI and TAVR on the same day, while 2161 (41.5%) underwent TAVR ≤30 days after PCI, and 1632 (31.3%) underwent TAVR >30 days after PCI. There was no significant difference for in-hospital mortality among the groups (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16-1.48, p = 0.203 for same-day versus ≤30 days; aOR 2.07, 95% CI 0.68-6.30, p = 0.199 for same-day versus >30 days). Patients who underwent TAVR ≤30 days after PCI had higher odds of acute kidney injury (aOR 1.49, 95% CI 1.05-2.10, p = 0.024), nonhome discharge (aOR 1.53, 95% CI 1.20-1.96, p = 0.001), and 90-day readmission (aOR 1.35, 95% CI 1.04-1.76, p = 0.026) compared with those who underwent same-day PCI and TAVR. Concomitant PCI and TAVR was associated with lower rates of 90-day readmissions and acute kidney injury compared with TAVR shortly after PCI (<30 days) and should be considered in select patients.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryAortic Valve StenosisCoronary Artery DiseasePercutaneous Coronary InterventionTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementAortic ValveHumansRisk FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID37643698
PMCPMC10924682
OpenAlexW4386203068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.