Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37643455›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of circumpolar health2023

History of dental caries in Inuit populations: genetic implications and 'distance effect'.

Julie Kabous, Rémi Esclassan, Emmanuelle Noirrit-Esclassan, Omar Alva, Pawan Krishna Murti, Liliane Paquet, Julie Grondin, Thierry Letellier, Denis Pierron

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of circumpolar health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Utilization of silver diamine fluoride by dentists in Canada: a review of the Non-Insured Health Benefits Dental Claims database.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julie KabousÉquipe de Médecine Evolutive, EVOLSAN faculté de chirurgie dentaire, Université Toulouse III, Toulouse, France.
Rémi EsclassanCAGT UMR 5288 CNRS, Université Paul Sabatier, UFR Santé - 3 Chemin des Maraîchers, Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6605-9967
Emmanuelle Noirrit-EsclassanDepartment of Prosthodontics, CHU de Toulouse, Hôtel-Dieu Saint Jacques, Toulouse, France.
Omar AlvaÉquipe de Médecine Evolutive, EVOLSAN faculté de chirurgie dentaire, Université Toulouse III, Toulouse, France.
Pawan Krishna MurtiÉquipe de Médecine Evolutive, EVOLSAN faculté de chirurgie dentaire, Université Toulouse III, Toulouse, France.
Liliane PaquetDepartment of Anthropology, Private practice in Kuujjuaq, Kuujjuaq, Canada.
Julie GrondinDepartment of Pedodontics, Private practice in L'Assomption, L'assomption, QC, Canada.
Thierry LetellierÉquipe de Médecine Evolutive, EVOLSAN faculté de chirurgie dentaire, Université Toulouse III, Toulouse, France.
Denis PierronÉquipe de Médecine Evolutive, EVOLSAN faculté de chirurgie dentaire, Université Toulouse III, Toulouse, France.
Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dental caries is considered the third most important scourge in the world. In North America, Inuit populations are the population the most severely affected by dental caries. It is often assumed that this situation can be explained by a combination of factors classical for Indigenous populations: remoteness (geographical distance), low economic status and low health literacy (cultural distance). Using a bibliographic approach, we tested this hypothesis of the "distance effect" by exploring the caries prevalence in other Indigenous populations living in high-income countries. Next, we tested whether the high prevalence of caries is due to population-specific characteristics by tracking caries prevalence over the past few centuries. In result, we showed that while other Indigenous populations are more impacted by caries than the general populations, the Inuit populations present the highest prevalence. Paradoxically, we showed also that past Inuit populations were almost immune to caries before 1950. These two elements suggest that the prevalence of caries observed presently is a recent maladaptation and that beyond the effect of cultural and geographical distance, specific biocultural factors have to be investigated.

Indexed as

Dental CariesGeographyHumansIndigenous PeoplesInuitSocioeconomic FactorsCaries prevalencedistanceindigenous populationsInuitrisks factors

Identifiers

PMID37643455
PMCPMC10467516
OpenAlexW4386244946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.