Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37643132›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2023

Assessing the Genomic Landscape of Cervical Cancers: Clinical Opportunities and Therapeutic Targets.

Claire F Friedman, Vignesh Ravichandran, Kathryn Miller, Chad Vanderbilt, Qin Zhou, Alexia Iasonos, Malavika Vivek, Pamela Mishra, Mario M Leitao, Vance Broach and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genomic Enrichment and Functional Impact of TP53 and CYLD Alterations in Recurrent and Metastatic HPV-Associated Head and Neck Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Research Progress of HER2 in Cervical Carcinoma.Cancer management and research · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Claire F FriedmanDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-2621-8553
Vignesh RavichandranMarie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-1532-2593
Kathryn MillerGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-7464-1981
Chad VanderbiltDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-8114-0237
Qin ZhouDepartment of Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-1225-2902
Alexia IasonosDepartment of Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-0471-8477
Malavika VivekMarie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0009-0000-5105-0292
Pamela MishraMarie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0009-0003-7114-0561
Mario M LeitaoGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-0818-3836
Vance BroachGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-1219-8857
Yukio SonodaGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-5059-2118
Chrisann KyiDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-3286-1860
Dmitriy ZamarinDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-0094-0161
Roisin E O'CearbhaillDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-8217-4554
Jason KonnerDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-0720-2719
Michael F BergerMarie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-3882-5000
Britta WeigeltDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-9927-1270
Amir Momeni BoroujeniDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-7714-370X
Kay J ParkDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-8989-2938
Carol AghajanianDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-0851-3225
David B SolitDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-6614-802X
Mark T A DonoghueMarie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-4538-6069

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTumor genomic profiling is increasingly used to guide treatment strategy in patients with cancer. We integrated tumor genomic, clinical demographic, and treatment response data to assess how prospective tumor-normal sequencing impacted treatment selection in patients with cervical cancer. EXPERIMENTAL

designCervical cancers were prospectively analyzed using the MSK-IMPACT (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center - Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets) next-generation sequencing panel. Clinical data, including histology, stage at diagnosis, treatment history, clinical trial enrollment and outcomes, date of last follow-up, and survival status were obtained from medical records.

resultsA total of 177 patients with cervical cancer (squamous, 69; endocervical adenocarcinoma, 50; gastric type, 22; adenosquamous, 21; and other, 15) underwent MSK-IMPACT testing. The most prevalent genomic alterations were somatic mutations or amplifications in PIK3CA (25%), ERBB2 (12%), KMT2C (10%), and KMT2D (9%). Furthermore, 13% of patients had high tumor mutational burden (TMB >10 mut/Mb), 3 of which were also microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H). Thirty-seven percent of cases had at least one potentially actionable alteration designated as a level 3B mutational event according to the FDA-recognized OncoKB tumor mutation database and treatment classification system. A total of 30 patients (17%) were enrolled on a therapeutic clinical trial, including 18 (10%) who were matched with a study based on their MSK-IMPACT results. Twenty patients (11%) participated in an immune checkpoint inhibition study for metastatic disease; 2 remain progression free at >5 years follow-up.

conclusionsTumor genomic profiling can facilitate the selection of targeted/immunotherapies, as well as clinical trial enrollment, for patients with cervical cancer.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorFemaleGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMicrosatellite InstabilityMutationProspective StudiesBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID37643132
PMCPMC10644000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.