Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37642995›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2023

Sharing Data With Shared Benefits: Artificial Intelligence Perspective.

Mohammad Tajabadi, Linus Grabenhenrich, Adèle Ribeiro, Michael Leyer, Dominik Heider

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. A conceptual framework for measuring AI health equity.International journal for equity in health · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Privacy-preserving decentralized learning methods for biomedical applications.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohammad TajabadiDepartment of Data Science in Biomedicine, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0000-4709-142X
Linus GrabenhenrichDepartment for Methods Development, Research Infrastructure and Information Technology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9300-6625
Adèle RibeiroDepartment of Data Science in Biomedicine, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4523-2062
Michael LeyerDepartment of Data Science in Biomedicine, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9429-7770
Dominik Heider *Department of Data Science in Biomedicine, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3108-8311

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) and data sharing go hand in hand. In order to develop powerful AI models for medical and health applications, data need to be collected and brought together over multiple centers. However, due to various reasons, including data privacy, not all data can be made publicly available or shared with other parties. Federated and swarm learning can help in these scenarios. However, in the private sector, such as between companies, the incentive is limited, as the resulting AI models would be available for all partners irrespective of their individual contribution, including the amount of data provided by each party. Here, we explore a potential solution to this challenge as a viewpoint, aiming to establish a fairer approach that encourages companies to engage in collaborative data analysis and AI modeling. Within the proposed approach, each individual participant could gain a model commensurate with their respective data contribution, ultimately leading to better diagnostic tools for all participants in a fair manner.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceData AnalysisInformation Disseminationapplicationsartificial intelligenceartificial intelligence modeldata analysisdata sharingdevelopmentdiagnostic toolfairnessfederated learningmachine learningmedical datatool

Identifiers

PMID37642995
PMCPMC10498316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.