Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37642985›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2023

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Assistive Technology for Executive Function Support for People With Acquired Brain Injury: Protocol for Single-Case Experimental Designs.

Em Bould, Robyn Tate, Grahame Simpson, Natasha Brusco, Lisa Licciardi, Libby Callaway

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Em BouldDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Monash University, Frankston, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3108-2072
Robyn TateKolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney Australia; John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Northern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney Australia, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4598-5408
Grahame SimpsonKolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney Australia; John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Northern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney Australia; Brain Injury Rehabilitation Research Group, Ingham Inst, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8156-9060
Natasha BruscoRehabilitation, Ageing and Independent Living (RAIL) Research Centre, Monash University, Frankston, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8825-5109
Lisa LicciardiDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Monash University, Frankston, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7707-5762
Libby CallawayDepartment of Occupational Therapy / Rehabilitation, Ageing and Independent Living (RAIL) Research Centre, Monash University, Frankston, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3127-6312
Monash University · AUThe University of Sydney · AUFrankston Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExecutive function, including prospective memory, initiating, planning, and sequencing everyday activities, is frequently affected by acquired brain injury (ABI). Executive dysfunction necessitates the use of compensatory cognitive strategies and, in more severe cases, human support over time. To compensate for the executive dysfunction experienced, growing options for electronic mainstream and assistive technologies may be used by people with ABI and their supporters.

objectiveWe outline the study protocol for a series of single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) to evaluate the effectiveness of smart home, mobile, and/or wearable technologies in reducing executive function difficulties following ABI.

methodsUp to 10 adults with ABI who experience executive dysfunction and have sufficient cognitive capacity to provide informed consent will be recruited across Victoria and New South Wales, Australia. Other key inclusion criteria are that they have substantial support needs for everyday living and reside in community dwellings. On the basis of the participant's identified goal(s) and target behavior(s), a specific electronic assistive technology will be selected for application. Both identification of the target behavior(s) and selection of the assistive technology will be determined via consultation with each participant (and their key support person, if applicable). The choice of SCED will be individualized for each participant based on the type of technology used in the intervention, the difficulty level of the behavior targeted for change, and the anticipated rate of change. For each SCED, repeated measurements of the target behavior(s) during the baseline condition will provide performance data for comparison with the performance data collected during the intervention condition (with technology introduced). Secondary outcome measures will evaluate the impact of the intervention. The protocol includes 2 customizable Microsoft Excel spreadsheets for electronic record keeping.

resultsRecruitment period is June 2022 through March 2024. Trial results for the individual participants will be graphed and analyzed separately using structured visual analysis supplemented with statistical analysis. Analysis will focus on important features of the data, including both within- and between-phase comparisons for response level, trend, variability, immediacy, consistency, and overlap. An exploratory economic evaluation will determine the impact on formal and informal support usage, together with quality of life, following the implementation of the new technological intervention.

conclusionsThe study has been designed to test the cause-effect functional relationships between the intervention-in this case, electronic assistive technology-and its effect in changing the target behavior(s). The evaluation evidence gained will offer new insights into the application of various electronic assistive technologies for people who experience executive dysfunction following ABI. Furthermore, the results will help increase the capacity of key stakeholders to harness the potential of technology to build independence and reduce the cost of care for this population.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12622000835741, https://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12622000835741.aspx. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/48503.

Indexed as

acquired brain injuryassistive technologyclinical research protocoleconomic evaluationexecutive functionsingle-case experimental design

Identifiers

PMID37642985
PMCPMC10498320
OpenAlexW4379471075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.