Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37642975›Full record

ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2026

Device use trends in neuroendovascular procedures in the United States from 2015 to 2020.

Arjun Rohit Adapa, Fazeel M Siddiqui, Aditya S Pandey

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Distal mechanical thrombectomy using beveled tip aspiration zoom catheters: A preliminary study.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026
    Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arjun Rohit AdapaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Fazeel M SiddiquiDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Michigan Health West, Wyoming, Michigan, USA.
Aditya S PandeyDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0789-4273
University of Michigan · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundNeuroendovascular therapies involve an everchanging landscape of new technologies. Understanding the real-world timeframe of adaptation of such technologies can provide further guidance on mechanisms that could be employed to shorten the duration necessary for the widespread use of proven therapies. In this study, we aim to investigate the trends in the use of neuroendovascular technologies, utilizing the sales of neuroendovascular devices, as a proxy for procedural volume.MethodsUtilizing a device sales data registry from the Decision Resources Group, a healthcare research and consulting company, we examined trends in the sales of devices utilized in cerebrovascular thrombectomy, cerebral aneurysm treatment, and carotid stenting from the same 407 reporting hospitals in the United States between January 1, 2015, and January 1, 2020. Device sales per year were plotted as both the total number of devices sold per year as well as the percent of total device sales when compared against at least one other device. The Cochran-Armitage test for trend was performed when comparing at least two devices to each other. Analyses were performed using RStudio Version 1.1.456 (https://rstudio.com).ResultsBetween 2015 and 2020, there was a significant increase in the use of flow-diverting stents as well as nondiverting stents utilized for coil assistance. However, the total number of coils utilized over the years has declined. In terms of stroke therapy, between 2015 and 2020, there was a trend of increased use of both aspiration catheters as well as stent retrievers, which plateaued in 2020. The number of stents used for carotid procedures has also been gradually increasing over time.ConclusionOur study demonstrates an increase in the use of flow-diverting stents, nondiverting stents, carotid stents, and reperfusion devices for acute ischemic stroke intervention between 2015 and 2020. Coil use for aneurysmal treatment has declined.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresIntracranial AneurysmNeurosurgical ProceduresStentsThrombectomyHumansUnited StatesAspiration cathetercarotid endarterectomycarotid stentingcoilneuroendovascular devicethrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID37642975
PMCPMC12852641
OpenAlexW4386246182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.