Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37642882›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2023

Diagnostic performance of screening mammography according to menstrual cycle among Asian women.

Mi-Ri Kwon, Yoosoo Chang, Inyoung Youn, Shin Ho Kook, Yoosun Cho, Boyoung Park, Seungho Ryu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mi-Ri KwonDepartment of Radiology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8225-3690
Yoosoo ChangCenter for Cohort Studies, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. yoosoo.chang@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6945-9050
Inyoung YounDepartment of Radiology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3518-3332
Shin Ho KookDepartment of Radiology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9843-1148
Yoosun ChoCenter for Cohort Studies, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5366-3455
Boyoung ParkDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1902-3184
Seungho RyuCenter for Cohort Studies, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. sh703.yoo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3927-8646

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2021R1A2C1014363Sungkyunkwan University SKKU Excellence in Research Award Research Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the performance metrics of screening mammography according to menstrual cycle week in premenopausal Asian women.

methodsThis retrospective study included 69,556 premenopausal Asian women who underwent their first screening mammography between 2011 and 2019. The presence or absence of a breast cancer diagnosis within 12 months after the index screening mammography served as the reference standard, determined by linking the study data to the national cancer registry data. Menstrual cycles were calculated, and participants were assigned to groups according to weeks 1-4. The performance metrics included cancer detection rate (CDR), sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV), with comparisons across menstrual cycles.

resultsAmong menstrual cycles, the lowest CDR at 4.7 per 1000 women (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.8-5.8 per 1000 women) was observed in week 4 (all P < 0.05). The highest sensitivity of 72.7% (95% CI, 61.4-82.3) was observed in week 1, although the results failed to reach statistical significance. The highest specificity of 80.4% (95% CI, 79.5-81.3%) was observed in week 1 (P = 0.01). The lowest PPV of 2.2% (95% CI, 1.8-2.7) was observed in week 4 (all P < 0.05).

conclusionScreening mammography tended to show a higher performance during week 1 and a lower performance during week 4 of the menstrual cycle among Asian women. These results emphasize the importance of timing recommendations that consider menstrual cycles to optimize the effectiveness of screening mammography for breast cancer detection.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMammographyEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMenstrual CycleRetrospective StudiesMammographyMenstrual cyclePerformanceScreening

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.