Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37642870›Full record

ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2024

Symmetry Detection in Autistic Adults Benefits from Local Processing in a Contour Integration Task.

Sabrina Subri, Letizia Palumbo, Emma Gowen

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sabrina SubriCenter of Optometry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Selangor, 42300, Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia. sabrinasubri@uitm.edu.my.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8842-6134
Letizia PalumboDepartment of Psychology, Liverpool Hope University, Liverpool, UK.
Emma GowenDivision of Psychology, Communication and Human Neuroscience, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Liverpool Hope University · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBUniversiti Teknologi MARA · MY

Funding

Malay People's Trust (MARA) Malay People's Trust (MARA)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Symmetry studies in autism are inconclusive possibly due to different types of stimuli used which depend on either local or global cues. Therefore, this study compared symmetry detection between 20 autistic and 18 non-autistic adults matched on age, IQ, gender and handedness, using contour integration tasks containing open and closed contours that rely more on local or global processing respectively. Results showed that the autistic group performed equally well with both stimuli and outperformed the non-autistic group only for the open contours, possibly due to a different strategy used in detecting symmetry. However, there were no group differences for the closed contour. Results explain discrepant findings in previous symmetry studies suggesting that symmetry tasks that favour a local strategy may be advantageous for autistic individuals. Implications of the findings towards understanding visual sensory issues in this group are discussed.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderAdultFemaleForm PerceptionHumansMalePattern Recognition, VisualPhotic StimulationYoung AdultAutismLocal processingSensory issuesSymmetryVision

Identifiers

PMID37642870
OpenAlexW4386245718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.