Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37642792›Full record

ReviewFunctional & integrative genomics2023

Genetic modification strategies for enhancing plant resilience to abiotic stresses in the context of climate change.

Amman KhokharVoytas, Muhammad Shahbaz, Muhammad Faisal Maqsood, Usman Zulfiqar, Nargis Naz, Usama Zafar Iqbal, Maheen Sara, Muhammad Aqeel, Noreen Khalid, Ali Noman and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readReviewLetter
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Functional & integrative genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
23.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Integrating physiological and multi-omics methods to elucidate heat stress tolerance for sustainable rice production.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Amman KhokharVoytasDepartment of Botany, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad ShahbazDepartment of Botany, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan. shahbazmuaf@yahoo.com.
Muhammad Faisal MaqsoodDepartment of Botany, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Pakistan.
Usman ZulfiqarDepartment of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, 63100, Pakistan. usman.zulfiqar@iub.edu.pk.
Nargis NazDepartment of Botany, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Pakistan.
Usama Zafar IqbalDepartment of Botany, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Maheen SaraDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Government College Women University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad AqeelState Key Laboratory of Herbage Improvement and Grassland Agro-ecosystems (SKLHIGA), College of Ecology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, People's Republic of China.
Noreen KhalidDepartment of Botany, Government College Women University Sialkot, Sialkot, Pakistan.
Ali NomanDepartment of Botany, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Faisal ZulfiqarDepartment of Horticultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, 63100, Pakistan.
Khalid M Al SyaadDepartment of Biology, College of Science, King Khalid University, Abha, 61413, Saudi Arabia.
Manal Abdullah AlShaqhaaDepartment of Biology, College of Science, King Khalid University, Abha, 61413, Saudi Arabia.
Islamia University of Bahawalpur · PKUniversity of Agriculture Faisalabad · PKKing Khalid University · SAGovernment College University, Faisalabad · PKGovernment College Women University Faisalabad · PKGovernment College Women University SialkotLanzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enhancing the resilience of plants to abiotic stresses, such as drought, salinity, heat, and cold, is crucial for ensuring global food security challenge in the context of climate change. The adverse effects of climate change, characterized by rising temperatures, shifting rainfall patterns, and increased frequency of extreme weather events, pose significant threats to agricultural systems worldwide. Genetic modification strategies offer promising approaches to develop crops with improved abiotic stress tolerance. This review article provides a comprehensive overview of various genetic modification techniques employed to enhance plant resilience. These strategies include the introduction of stress-responsive genes, transcription factors, and regulatory elements to enhance stress signaling pathways. Additionally, the manipulation of hormone signaling pathways, osmoprotectant accumulation, and antioxidant defense mechanisms is discussed. The use of genome editing tools, such as CRISPR-Cas9, for precise modification of target genes related to stress tolerance is also explored. Furthermore, the challenges and future prospects of genetic modification for abiotic stress tolerance are highlighted. Understanding and harnessing the potential of genetic modification strategies can contribute to the development of resilient crop varieties capable of withstanding adverse environmental conditions caused by climate change, thereby ensuring sustainable agricultural productivity and food security.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeGene EditingAgricultureCold TemperatureCrops, AgriculturalAbiotic stressCRISPR/Cas9Crop improvementGenetic engineeringGenome editing

Identifiers

PMID37642792
OpenAlexW4386252718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.