ReviewMicrobiologyOpen2023
Evaluating models and assessment techniques for understanding oral biofilm complexity.
Review in MicrobiologyOpen, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reduced Biofilm Accumulation on Implants Treated With Implantoplasty-An In Situ Trial With a Within-Subject Comparison.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2024Trial
- Multidimensional Characterization of Surface Properties and Microbial Biofilm Formation in Commercial Flowable Resin-Based Dental Composites.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Comparison of Laser and Conventional Root Canal Disinfection Protocols in an dual-biofilm in-vitro model.Lasers in medical science · 2026Article
- Digitally-driven optimization of intraoral water jet parameters for plaque removal: a personalized 3D-guided orthogonal study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Biomimetic Design of Dental Restorative Materials: Conceptual Framework and Translational Challenges.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- An Innovative Oral Ex Vivo Biofilm Model for Antimicrobial Investigations.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The impact of DNA extraction methods on species quantification and apparent community composition of in vitro oral biofilms.FEMS microbiology letters · 2026Article
- Advances in oral disease models: a mini-review of developments from 2015 to 2025.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Review
- A dual-loop chemostat to investigate multi-species biofilms on implant surfaces under adjustable flow conditions.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- A Chlorhexidine Nanocarrier Strategy to Combat Oral Candidiasis Microcosm Biofilms.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Elimination Effect of Medical-Grade Honey onJournal of clinical medicine research · 2025Article
- Short-Term Probiotic Colonization Alters Molecular Dynamics of 3D Oral Biofilms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Viable but non-cultivable state in oral microbiota: a critical review of an underexplored microbial survival strategy.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
- Biofilm Formation on Hybrid, Resin-Based CAD/CAM Materials for Indirect Restorations: A Comprehensive Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Rhamnolipid 89 Biosurfactant Is Effective againstInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Evaluating models and assessment techniques for understanding oral biofilm complexity.MicrobiologyOpen · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral biofilms are three-dimensional (3D) complex entities initiating dental diseases and have been evaluated extensively in the scientific literature using several biofilm models and assessment techniques. The list of biofilm models and assessment techniques may overwhelm a novice biofilm researcher. This narrative review aims to summarize the existing literature on biofilm models and assessment techniques, providing additional information on selecting an appropriate model and corresponding assessment techniques, which may be useful as a guide to the beginner biofilm investigator and as a refresher to experienced researchers. The review addresses previously established 2D models, outlining their advantages and limitations based on the growth environment, availability of nutrients, and the number of bacterial species, while also exploring novel 3D biofilm models. The growth of biofilms on clinically relevant 3D models, particularly melt electrowritten fibrous scaffolds, is discussed with a specific focus that has not been previously reported. Relevant studies on validated oral microcosm models that have recently gaining prominence are summarized. The review analyses the advantages and limitations of biofilm assessment methods, including colony forming unit culture, crystal violet, 2,3-bis-(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide inner salt assays, confocal microscopy, fluorescence in situ hybridization, scanning electron microscopy, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and next-generation sequencing. The use of more complex models with advanced assessment methodologies, subject to the availability of equipment/facilities, may help in developing clinically relevant biofilms and answering appropriate research questions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.