ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2023
Keep It or Leave It? Comparison of Preoperative Scoring as Mortality Predictor Post-Pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk stratification of postoperative pancreatic fistula and other complications following pancreatoduodenectomy. How far are we? A scoping review.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the common procedure in resectable periampullary malignancies. However, the postoperative mortality rate for PD is relatively high. Mortality scoring system helps surgeons to decide patients' eligibility for surgery to minimize mortality risk. This study aimed to compare four scoring systems for mortality prediction after PD in the Indonesian population.
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, data were retrospectively collected from medical records for patients who underwent PD due to periampullary malignancy between January 2010 and January 2022. We assessed scoring accuracy, cut-off, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and area under the curve (AUC) of Naples prognostic score (NPS), Whipple-ABACUS (WA), modified Pitt score (MPS), and Pitt score.
resultOf the 116 patients who met the criteria, the mortality rate was 12.1%. Mean age was 51.64 ± 10.22 years consist of 75.9% group <60 years and 24.1% ≥60 years, with 46.6% male and 53.4% female. The AUC from highest to lowest were Pitt Score 0.890 (p<0.001), MPS 0.775 (p 0.001), WA 0.627 (p 0.123), and NPS 0.505 (p 0.949) with the level of accuracy of each score were Pitt Score and MPS 67.2%, WA 50.0%, and NPS 59.5%.
conclusionPitt and MPS scores have the highest accuracy of all the scoring systems in this study. MPS has the advantage of having fewer components, making it easy to implement. MPS can replace the role of the Pitt Score in predicting post-procedure PD mortality in Indonesia. Further studies that include the intraoperative factors are needed to increase the scoring accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.