ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2024
Safety and effectiveness assessment of endovascular recanalization for non-acute middle cerebral artery occlusion.
Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of factors influencing recurrent stroke due to symptomatic non-acute middle cerebral artery occlusion and prediction modelling.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Association between ASPECTS region of infarction and clinical outcome in non-acute large vessel occlusion ischaemic stroke after endovascular recanalisation.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2025Article
- Predictive factors of successful endovascular recanalization for symptomatic atherosclerotic non-acute middle cerebral artery occlusion.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Safety and effectiveness assessment of endovascular recanalization for non-acute middle cerebral artery occlusion.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndovascular treatment for patients with symptomatic nonacute middle cerebral artery occlusion remains clinically challenging, and proof of a beneficial effect on functional outcome is lacking. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of endovascular recanalization for patients with symptomatic nonacute middle cerebral artery occlusion.
methodsNinety-eight patients with symptomatic atherosclerotic nonacute middle cerebral artery occlusion were divided into drug treatment groups (42) and endovascular treatment groups (56). The rate of recanalization, peri-procedural complications, and follow-up results were evaluated.
resultsAmong the 56 patients who received endovascular treatment, 53 (94.6%) achieved successful recanalization. The rate of peri-procedural complications was 7.1% (4/56), and the death rate was 1.8% (1/56). Any stroke within 90 days was 7.1% (4/56). Among the 42 patients in drug treatment group, any stroke within 90 days was 19.0% (8/42), death rate was 0.
conclusionAmong patients with symptomatic nonacute middle cerebral artery occlusion with a short length of occlusion and a moderate-to-good collateral circulation, endovascular treatment seems to be safe. And endovascular treatment could reduce the recurrence rate of stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.