Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37641851›Full record

ReviewBJPsych open2023

The impact of family interventions on communication in the context of anxiety and depression in those aged 14-24 years: systematic review of randomised control trials.

Alex Lloyd, Amy Broadbent, Edmund Brooks, Karen Bulsara, Kim Donoghue, Rouhma Saijaf, Katie N Sampson, Abigail Thomson, Pasco Fearon, Peter J Lawrence

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJPsych open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alex LloydDepartment of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0627-0952
Amy BroadbentMember of the Young People's Advisory Group.
Edmund BrooksMember of the Parents and Carers' Advisory Group.
Karen BulsaraMember of the Parents and Carers' Advisory Group.
Kim DonoghueDepartment of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7316-1716
Rouhma SaijafMember of the Young People's Advisory Group.
Katie N SampsonNational Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, The Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK.
Abigail ThomsonDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5322-8488
Pasco FearonDepartment of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, UK; Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK; and Developmental Neuroscience Unit, Anna Freud Centre, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1847-8443
Peter J LawrenceSchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6181-433X

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ability to communicate is integral to all human relationships. Previous research has specifically highlighted communication within families as both a risk and protective factor for anxiety disorders and/or depression. Yet, there is limited understanding about whether communication is amenable to intervention in the context of adolescent psychopathology, and whether doing so improves outcomes.

aimsThe aim of this systematic review was to determine in which contexts and for whom does addressing communication in families appear to work, not work and why?

methodWe pre-registered our systematic review with PROSPERO (identifier CRD42022298719), followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidance and assessed study quality with the Risk of Bias 2 tool.

resultsSeven randomised controlled trials were identified from a systematic search of the literature. There was significant heterogeneity in the features of communication that were measured across these studies. There were mixed findings regarding whether family-focused interventions led to improvements in communication. Although there was limited evidence that family-focused interventions led to improvements in communication relative to interventions without a family-focused component, we discuss these findings in the context of the significant limitations in the studies reviewed.

conclusionsWe conclude that further research is required to assess the efficacy of family-focused interventions for improving communication in the context of anxiety and depression in those aged 14-24 years.

Indexed as

Anxiety or fear-related disorderscognitive–behavioural therapiesdepressive disorderspsychosocial interventionsrandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID37641851
PMCPMC10594091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.