ArticleCureus2023
Experience of Percutaneous Closure of Ventricular Septal Defects in 140 Patients With Different Duct Occluders in a Tertiary Care Rural Hospital in Central India.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Muscular VSD Device Complications: Literature Review and Possible Implications for Echocardiographic Follow-Up.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Early experience with transcatheter ventricular septal defects closure with the KONAR-MF multifunctional occluder.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Hybrid approach: a prospective option for treating congenital heart defects in pediatric patients.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Ventricular septal defects (VSDs) are the most common type of septal defects in early infants and are very complicated. This has paved the way for the development of new minimally invasive procedures for interventional cardiologists. This study presents our experience using duct occluders instead of conventional ventricular septal devices in the Department of Cardiology at Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital (AVBRH) in central rural India. This study aimed to review success and complications and assess safety and its relation to age, sex, size of the VSDs, type of VSD, and types of devices used after transcatheter closure of perimembranous and muscular VSDs using various types of duct occluders. Methodology This retrospective study included patients who underwent percutaneous VSD device closure at the AVBRH between July 2017 and December 2020. We reviewed the patients' medical records to recognize imaging, clinical, and interventional data pre- and post-procedure and at the last follow-up. Results The success rate of VSD closure was 98.6%, one (0.7%) out of 81 females developed a complication due to device dislodgement, and one male aged six years (0.7%) out of 59 developed a post-procedural complication; hence, the total failure rate was 1.4%. The perimembranous type had no complication, and the muscular type had two (14.3%) unsuccessful procedures. Conclusion This study has concluded an impressive percentage of VSD closure, showing no mortality and low morbidity, using a percutaneous approach with different duct occluders. As the type of device used is not correlated with device failure and failure rate, duct occluders will be financially helpful in the closure of VSD in indicated patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.