Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37641584›Full record

ArticleJournal of midwifery & women's health

Perinatal Telehealth: Meeting Patients Where They Are.

Katherine Kissler, E Brie Thumm, Denise C Smith, Jessica L Anderson, Rachel E Wood, Rachel Johnson, Mia Roberts, Alex Carmitchel-Fifer, Nicole Patterson, Claudia R Amura and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of midwifery & women's health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Socio-Structural Intersect With Post-COVID-19 Telehealth Utilization for Hispanic/Latino Groups in Colorado: A Mixed Methods Study.Journal of transcultural nursing : official journal of the Transcultural Nursing Society · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine KisslerCollege of Nursing, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.ORCID 0000-0002-5753-720X
E Brie ThummCollege of Nursing, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.ORCID 0000-0001-7646-5195
Denise C SmithCollege of Nursing, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.ORCID 0000-0002-5993-4524
Jessica L AndersonCollege of Nursing, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
Rachel E WoodSchool of Nursing, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
Rachel JohnsonCollege of Nursing, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
Mia RobertsCollege of Nursing, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.ORCID 0000-0001-9806-2813
Alex Carmitchel-FiferInvest in Kids, Denver, Colorado.
Nicole PattersonCollege of Nursing, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.ORCID 0000-0003-3899-4584
Claudia R AmuraCollege of Nursing, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
Amy J BartonCollege of Nursing, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
Jacqueline JonesCollege of Nursing, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USColorado Kidney Care · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

NIH Prior Approval Process ProfessionalUL1TR002535 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2018 to 2022
$51.1M
Quality, Safety, Value: Impact of sudden shift to telehealth due to COVID-19 within Nurse-led care models located in Colorado rural and urban communitiesR01HS028085 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI BARTON, AMY J · 2021 to 2022
$945k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS028085AHRQ HHS R01 HS028085-01AHRQ HHS UL1 TR002535NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002535
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPrior to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, studies of innovative telehealth perinatal care models showed similar clinical outcomes and perceived quality of care between groups receiving a combination of virtual video and in-person visits. However, these studies included primarily White, English-speaking participants, excluding those who were economically disenfranchised or did not speak English. The purpose of this qualitative study was to describe perinatal patients' and providers' experiences with telehealth during and after the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic to inform future utilization of telehealth to drive the delivery of high-quality, accessible, and equitable perinatal care to diverse communities.

methodsThis descriptive qualitative study included a purposive sample of 14 patients and 17 providers who received or provided perinatal care via telehealth in either a certified nurse-midwifery practice or the nurse-family partnership care model between March 2020 and April 2022. Maximum variation sampling offered a diverse population based on race, ethnicity, and rurality. Researchers conducted 2 rounds of semistructured interviews with a focus on understanding social and geographic context.

resultsSix themes were identified through inductive analysis: (1) unexpected advantages of telehealth, (2) patient empowerment, (3) providers' fear of adverse outcomes, (4) concern for equitable care, (5) strategies to enhance the telehealth experience, and (6) strategies to address access to perinatal telehealth. Patients appreciated the increased ease and reduced cost of accessing visits, which led to fewer missed appointments. Health care providers saw great opportunity in telehealth but expressed concerns about accessibility for patients with language barriers or limited resources. DISCUSSION: This study provides insight into priorities for continued telehealth utilization focused on providing equitable access to perinatal care. Rather than returning to practices from before the COVID-19 pandemic formed from longstanding routines and perceived limitations, providers are encouraged to capitalize on the rapid innovations in telehealth to build a more effective, equitable, and patient-centered approach to perinatal care.

Indexed as

COVID-19MidwiferyTelemedicineCertificationFemaleHumansPandemicsPregnancyhealth care disparityhealth equityinnovation diffusionmidwiferypostpartum depressionpostpartum periodprenatal carequalitative researchrural healthtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID37641584
PMCPMC10873126
OpenAlexW4386253816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.