ArticleEarly intervention in psychiatry2024
Development of the PSYCHS: Positive SYmptoms and Diagnostic Criteria for the CAARMS Harmonized with the SIPS.
Article in Early intervention in psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Eating disorders and disordered eating symptoms in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eating and weight disorders : EWD · 2024Pooled it
- Functional brain connectivity in clinical high-risk youth from the Kenya psychosis-risk outcomes study (KePROS): functional network comparative area and topography analysis (FUNCATA).NeuroImage. Clinical · 2026Article
- Comparative profiles of anomalous self-experiences and social cognition in clinical high risk for psychosis and autism spectrum disorder.Schizophrenia research. Cognition · 2026Article
- Using Large Language Models to Measure Symptom Severity Scores in Patients At-Risk for Schizophrenia.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2026Article
- Premorbid adjustment problems, negative symptoms, and cognitive impairment in a large international sample at clinical high risk for psychosis: Findings from the Accelerating Medicines Partnership-Schizophrenia.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2026Article
- Evaluating large language models for assessment of psychosis risk.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Subcategories of the Clinical High-Risk State for Psychosis and Their Relationship to a Full First-Episode Psychosis Sample: An Exploratory Analysis of Longitudinal Outcomes.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2026Article
- Mobile Technology for Real-Life Assessment of Positive and Negative Symptoms as well as Stress Among Individuals With Early Psychosis: A Scoping Review.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2026Article
- The problem of recognition of clinical high-risk states is hampering the prevention of schizophrenia.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026Article
- Phantom vibrations: An understudied marker of clinical risk for psychosis.Schizophrenia research · 2026Article
- The Mini-CAARMS: Development and Validation of a Short Version of the Comprehensive Assessment of AT Risk Mental States to Facilitate Preventive Psychiatry.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2026Article
- Accelerating Access to Early Intervention Through Hospital-Wide Outreach and Enhanced Referral Support.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Structural covariance network topology in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis: the ENIGMA-CHR Study.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- Predicting ordinal clinical outcomes in at-risk mental states: a multimodal approach.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Relationship among Sleep Disturbance, Stress, and Suicidal Ideation in Clinical High Risk for Psychosis.Schizophrenia bulletin open · 2026Article
- Emergence and Dynamics of Delusions and Hallucinations Across Stages in Early Psychosis.Biological psychiatry · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of a Brief Age-Normed Screening Tool for Subthreshold Psychosis Symptoms in Youth.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2025Article
- Identifying individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis using a battery of tasks sensitive to symptom mechanisms.Translational psychiatry · 2025Article
- Psychosis Risk: Time to Look Empirically at a First-step Economical-pragmatic Way to Examine Anomalous Self-experience. Exploring the SQuEASE-11.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2025Article
- Targeting the Roots of Psychosis: The Role of Aberrant Salience.Pediatric reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
73 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo harmonize two ascertainment and severity rating instruments commonly used for the clinical high risk syndrome for psychosis (CHR-P): the Structured Interview for Psychosis-risk Syndromes (SIPS) and the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS).
methodsThe initial workshop is described in the companion report from Addington et al. After the workshop, lead experts for each instrument continued harmonizing attenuated positive symptoms and criteria for psychosis and CHR-P through an intensive series of joint videoconferences.
resultsFull harmonization was achieved for attenuated positive symptom ratings and psychosis criteria, and modest harmonization for CHR-P criteria. The semi-structured interview, named Positive SYmptoms and Diagnostic Criteria for the CAARMS Harmonized with the SIPS (PSYCHS), generates CHR-P criteria and severity scores for both CAARMS and SIPS.
conclusionsUsing the PSYCHS for CHR-P ascertainment, conversion determination, and attenuated positive symptom severity rating will help in comparing findings across studies and in meta-analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.