ArticleJournal of dairy science2023
Interaction of DGAT1 polymorphism, parity, and acetate supplementation on feeding behavior, milk synthesis, and plasma metabolites.
Article in Journal of dairy science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acetate supplementation increases milk fat production, but interactions with animal-related factors have not been investigated. The objective of this study was to characterize the interaction of acetate supplementation with parity and genetic potential for milk fat synthesis including the DGAT1 K232A polymorphism (AA and KA genotypes). In total, 47 primiparous and 49 multiparous lactating cows were used in 2 blocks in a crossover design. The basal diet was formulated to have a low risk of biohydrogenation-induced milk fat depression and had 32.8% and 32.0% neutral detergent fiber and 21.7% and 23.6% starch [all on a dry matter (DM) basis] in block 1 and 2, respectively. The control treatment received the basal diet, and the acetate supplementation treatment included anhydrous sodium acetate supplemented to the basal diet at 3.2% and 3.1% of DM of the diet for block 1 and 2, respectively (targeting 10 mol/d of acetate). The DGAT1 genotype frequency of the experimental cows was 45% AA and 51% KA, with 4% cows with either a KK or unimputable genotype. Acetate supplementation increased DM intake (DMI) in KA multiparous cows, but acetate did not change DMI in AA multiparous or primiparous cows of either genotype. Acetate supplementation increased the frequency of meals by 8% and decreased the length of each meal by ∼5 min compared with control. There was no effect of acetate on milk yield. Acetate supplementation increased milk fat yield and concentration by 117 g/d and 0.31 percentage units, respectively, regardless of DGAT1 polymorphism or parity. The increase in milk fat yield was mostly due to an increase in yield of 16C mixed-sourced fatty acids, suggesting that acetate supplementation drives mammary de novo synthesis toward completion. Response to acetate supplementation was not related to genomic predicted transmitting ability of milk fat concentration and yield or to pretrial milk fat percent and yield, suggesting that acetate increases milk fat production regardless of genetic potential for milk fat yield and level of milk fat synthesis. Interestingly, analyzing the temporal effect on the interaction between treatment and DGAT1 polymorphism on milk fat yield suggested that DGAT1 polymorphism may affect the short-term response to acetate supplementation during the first ≤7 d on treatment. Acetate supplementation also increased plasma β-hydroxybutyrate concentration and decreased plasma glucose concentration. In conclusion, acetate supplementation consistently increased milk fat synthesis regardless of parity or genetic potential for milk fat synthesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.