Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37641142›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2023

Mapping implementation strategies of evidence-based interventions for three preselected phenomena in people with dementia-a scoping review.

Mike Rommerskirch-Manietta, Christina Manietta, Daniel Purwins, Jana Isabelle Braunwarth, Tina Quasdorf, Martina Roes

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Mike Rommerskirch-Manietta *Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Site Witten, Witten, Germany. Mike.Rommerskirch-Manietta@dzne.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1533-3006
Christina Manietta *Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Site Witten, Witten, Germany.
Daniel PurwinsDeutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Site Witten, Witten, Germany.
Jana Isabelle BraunwarthDeutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Site Witten, Witten, Germany.
Tina QuasdorfDeutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Site Witten, Witten, Germany.
Martina RoesDeutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Site Witten, Witten, Germany.
Witten/Herdecke University · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Gesundheit FKZ 5021FSB001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCaring for people with dementia is complex, and there are various evidence-based interventions. However, a gap exists between the available interventions and how to implement them. The objectives of our review are to identify implementation strategies, implementation outcomes, and influencing factors for the implementation of evidence-based interventions that focus on three preselected phenomena in people with dementia: (A) behavior that challenges supporting a person with dementia in long-term care, (B) delirium in acute care, and (C) postacute care needs.

methodsWe conducted a scoping review according to the description of the Joanna Briggs Institute. We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. For the data analysis, we conducted deductive content analysis. For this analysis, we used the Expert Recommendations for Implementation Change (ERIC), implementation outcomes according to Proctor and colleagues, and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

resultsWe identified 362 (A), 544 (B), and 714 records (C) on the three phenomena and included 7 (A), 3 (B), and 3 (C) studies. Among the studies, nine reported on the implementation strategies they used. Clusters with the most reported strategies were adapt and tailor to context and train and educate stakeholders. We identified one study that tested the effectiveness of the applied implementation strategy, while ten studies reported implementation outcomes (mostly fidelity). Regarding factors that influence implementation, all identified studies reported between 1 and 19 factors. The most reported factors were available resources and the adaptability of the intervention. To address dementia-specific influencing factors, we enhanced the CFIR construct of patient needs and resources to include family needs and resources.

conclusionsWe found a high degree of homogeneity across the different dementia phenomena, the evidence-based interventions, and the care settings in terms of the implementation strategies used, implementation outcomes measured, and influencing factors identified. However, it remains unclear to what extent implementation strategies themselves are evidence-based and which intervention strategy can be used by practitioners when either the implementation outcomes are not adjusted to the implementation strategy and/or the effects of implementation strategies are mostly unknown. Future research needs to focus on investigating the effectiveness of implementation strategies for evidence-based interventions for dementia care.

trial registrationThe review protocol was prospectively published (Manietta et al., BMJ Open 11:e051611, 2021).

Indexed as

CFIRDementiaERICImplementation scienceOutcomes

Identifiers

PMID37641142
PMCPMC10463361
OpenAlexW4386224397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.