ArticleBMC nursing2023
Influence of oral comprehensive nursing intervention on mechanically ventilated patients in ICU: a randimized controlled study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of an oral care bundle on salivary pH, dry mouth and ventilator-associated pneumonia in intubated patients: a randomized controlled trial.BMC oral health · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Application of double-sleeve endotracheal tube in infection control for icu patients: a randomized controlled trial.Head & face medicine · 2025Trial
- Environmental constraints and their impact on role conflict and ambiguity among ICU nurses providing oral care: a qualitative study using role theory.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Understanding and Practices of Oral Hygiene in the Intensive Care Units: Perspectives of Medical Staff at Two University Hospital Centers.Acta stomatologica Croatica · 2024Article
- Perceptions, barriers, and challenges of oral care among nursing assistants in the intensive care unit: a qualitative study.BMC oral health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the effect of oral comprehensive nursing intervention on mechanically ventilated patients in ICU.
methodsSelect 76 cases of mechanically ventilated patients in severe ICU admitted to our hospital from January 2022 to October 2022 as the research objects, and divide them into the control group and the observation group according to the way the patients receive oral care. 38 cases each. The patients in the control group received routine nursing intervention, and the patients in the observation group received comprehensive oral nursing intervention on the basis of the nursing of the control group. The clinical index data, oropharyngeal hygiene, pH value, blood gas analysis index levels, and the occurrence and death of ventilator-associated pneumonia were compared between the two groups of patients.
resultsThe hospitalization time of the two groups was compared (P > 0.05); the mechanical ventilation time and ICU stay time of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group (all, P < 0.05); the oral odor scores, The plaque index and soft scale index were significantly lower than those of the control group (all, P < 0.05); the pH value, PaO
conclusionThe application of nursing intervention can effectively promote the recovery of patients, improve the hygiene of patients' oropharynx, adjust the levels of pH and blood gas-related indicators in patients, and reduce VAP in patients. risk of morbidity and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.