Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37641046›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2023

A biomechanical investigation of a novel intramedullary nail used to salvage failed internal fixations in intertrochanteric fractures.

Ping Chen, Zhirong Fan, Nengneng Xu, Haizhou Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ping Chen *The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Zhirong Fan *The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Nengneng XuPanyu Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 511401, China.
Haizhou WangThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China. szylngzk@gzucm.edu.cn.
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82205150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe ideal approach for revision surgery following femoral head salvage treatments for an intertrochanteric fracture is still up for debate. A novel variety of proximal femoral bionic intramedullary nail (PFBN) has been created in clinical practice. We aimed to compare the biomechanical results of the novel implant to conventional intramedullary and extramedullary fixation in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture following primary internal fixation failure.

methodsUsing finite element analysis, we created a three-dimensional model of the intertrochanteric fracture's helical blade cut-out for this investigation. The PFBN 1 group, the PFBN 2 group, the PFNA group, and the DHS group were our four test groups. For each fracture group, the von Mises stress and displacements of the femur and internal fixation components were measured under 2100 N axial loads.

resultsThe values for the femoral displacement in the PFBN1 group, PFBN2 group, PFNA group, and DHS group were 6.802 mm, 6.716 mm, 8.080 mm, and 8.679 mm, respectively. The internal implant displacement values were 6.201 mm, 6.138 mm, 7.396 mm, and 8.075 mm in the PFBN1 group, PFBN2 group, PFNA group, and DHS group, respectively. The maximum von Mises Stress in the femoral was 187.2 MPa, 85.18 MPa, 106.6 MPa, and 386.2 MPa in the PFBN1 groups, PFBN2 groups, PFNA groups, and DHS groups, respectively. In the PFBN1 groups, PFBN2 groups, PFNA groups, and DHS groups, the maximum von Mises Stress in internal fixation was 586.7 MPa, 559.8 MPa, 370.7 MPa, and 928.4.8 MPa, respectively.

conclusionOur biomechanical research demonstrates that intramedullary fixation is more stable than extramedullary fixation when salvaging failed internal fixations in intertrochanteric fracture. Compared with PFNA and DHS, PFBN showed better biomechanical stability in the treatment of patients with revised intertrochanteric fractures. In light of this, we advocate PFBN fixation as the method of choice for intertrochanteric fracture revision. This result still has to be confirmed in more clinical research.

Indexed as

Fracture Fixation, InternalHip FracturesBionicsFemurHumansInternal FixatorsFEAIntertrochanteric fracturePFBNPFNARevision surgery

Identifiers

PMID37641046
PMCPMC10463605
OpenAlexW4386225433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.