ArticleBMC nursing2023
Risk prediction of sleep disturbance in clinical nurses: a nomogram and artificial neural network model.
Article in BMC nursing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Building and externally validating a prediction model for long COVID in severe and critical COVID-19 patients: a multi-center cohort study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Observational
- Effectiveness of Total Body Resistance Exercise Intervention on Sleep Quality Among Nursing Staff.The journal of nursing research : JNR · 2026Article
- Identifying Latent Profiles of Interpersonal Conflict Among Psychiatric Nurses and Exploring Their Associations With Psychological Capital, Sleep Quality, and Coping Styles: A Person-Centered Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a prediction model for the incidence of psychological disturbance in Chinese nurses: baseline data from a cohort study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Prevalence of Poor Sleep Quality and Associated Factors Among Nurses in Southeast Iran: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Article
- The chain mediating role of resilience and change fatigue between intolerance of uncertainty and job burnout in nurses.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Stress, Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms, Burnout and Insomnia Among Greek Nurses One Year After the End of the Pandemic: A Moderated Chain Mediation Model.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Construction and validation of a presenteeism prediction model for ICU nurses in China.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Relationship between occupational stress and sleep quality among emergency nurses.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Bibliometric Analysis of Development Trends and Research Hotspots in the Study of Data Mining in Nursing Based on CiteSpace.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSleep disturbance occur among nurses at a high incidence.
aimTo develop a Nomogram and a Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model to predict sleep disturbance in clinical nurses.
methodsA total of 434 clinical nurses participated in the questionnaire, a cross-sectional study conducted from August 2021 to June 2022.They were randomly distributed in a 7:3 ratio between training and validation cohorts.Nomogram and ANN model were developed using predictors of sleep disturbance identified by univariate and multivariate analyses in the training cohort; The 1000 bootstrap resampling and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) were used to evaluate the predictive accuracy in the training and validation cohorts.
resultsSleep disturbance was found in 180 of 304 nurses(59.2%) in the training cohort and 80 of 130 nurses (61.5%) in the validation cohort.Age, chronic diseases, anxiety, depression, burnout, and fatigue were identified as risk factors for sleep disturbance. The calibration curves of the two models are well-fitted. The sensitivity and specificity (95% CI) of the models were calculated, resulting in sensitivity of 83.9%(77.5-88.8%)and 88.8% (79.2-94.4%) and specificity of83.1% (75.0-89.0%) and 74.0% (59.4-84.9%) for the training and validation cohorts, respectively.
conclusionsThe sleep disturbance risk prediction models constructed in this study have good consistency and prediction efficiency, and can effectively predict the occurrence of sleep disturbance in clinical nurses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.