Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37641012›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2023

Regional with urban-rural variation in low birth weight and its determinants of Indian children: findings from National Family Health Survey 5 data.

Ramendra Nath Kundu, Anushka Ghosh, Birshikha Chhetri, Indranil Saha, Md Golam Hossain, Premananda Bharati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ramendra Nath KunduFormer Research Fellow, Department of Anthropology, West Bengal State University, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700126, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7696-8067
Anushka GhoshJunior Research Fellow, Indian Council of Medical Research-Centre for Ageing & Mental Health, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Birshikha ChhetriJunior Research Fellow, Indian Council of Medical Research-Centre for Ageing & Mental Health, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Indranil SahaScientist E, Indian Council of Medical Research-Centre for Ageing & Mental Health, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6622-7695
Md Golam HossainHealth Research Group, Department of Statistics, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi, 6205, Bangladesh. hossain95@yahoo.com.
Premananda BharatiFormer Professor and Head, Biological Anthropology Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow birth weight is a key indicator for child health, especially a concern in low-middle-income countries. However, health and medically-related reforms are being actively implemented in some middle-income countries like India. Identifying low birth weight (LBW) babies with their determinants across the whole country is essential to formulate regional and area-specific interventions. The objective of this study was to find out the burden and determinants of LBW on the regional and residential (rural-urban) divisions of India.

methodsThe present study was based on the NFHS-5 dataset (2019-21), a nationally representative survey in India. A total of 209,223 births were included in this study. A newborn weighing less than 2500 g was considered as LBW. According to the objectives, we used frequency distribution, chi-square test and binary logistic regression analysis for analysing the data.

resultsAbout 18.24% of the babies were LBW in India, significantly higher in rural areas than in urban areas (18.58% vs 17.36%). Regionally prevalence was more frequent in western (20.63%) and central (20.16%) rural areas. Regarding maternal concerns, in the eastern and southern regions of India, mothers aged 25-34 were less likely to have LBW children than mothers aged 35-49 years. It was found that the risk of LBW was more likely among the children born out of unintended pregnancies in almost all regions except for eastern part. In rural India, women who delivered children at home were more likely to have LBW children in India (AOR = 1.19, CI: 1.12-1.28, p < 0.001) and its central, northern, and southern regions than those who gave birth in institutions. The study indicates that LBW coexists with lower maternal education levels and poor household wealth index across all regions. About 58% and 57% of cumulative effects of independent variables on LBW can be distinguished in urban and rural India, respectively.

conclusionsTargeted-specific strategies need to be undertaken as per region and geographical variations. Then only India should be able to decline LBW as proposed by National Health Policy.

Indexed as

Asian PeopleChild HealthInfant, Low Birth WeightAdultEducational StatusFamily HealthFemaleHealth SurveysHumansIndiaInfantInfant, NewbornMiddle AgedPregnancyRural PopulationUrban PopulationBirth weightPublic healthSDGUnder-five childrenWealth index

Identifiers

PMID37641012
PMCPMC10464394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.