Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37640911›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2023

Propagation of activity through the cortical hierarchy and perception are determined by neural variability.

James M Rowland, Thijs L van der Plas, Matthias Loidolt, Robert M Lees, Joshua Keeling, Jonas Dehning, Thomas Akam, Viola Priesemann, Adam M Packer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Interhemispheric resting-state functional connectivity correlates with spontaneous neural interactions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. ACS chemical neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

James M Rowland *Department of Physiology, Anatomy, and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Thijs L van der Plas *Department of Physiology, Anatomy, and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Matthias Loidolt *Department of Physiology, Anatomy, and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Robert M LeesDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy, and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5473-4219
Joshua KeelingDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy, and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Jonas DehningMax Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, Göttingen, Germany.
Thomas AkamDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1810-0494
Viola PriesemannMax Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8905-5873
Adam M PackerDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy, and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. adampacker@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5884-794X

Funding

Wellcome Trust 204651/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brains are composed of anatomically and functionally distinct regions performing specialized tasks, but regions do not operate in isolation. Orchestration of complex behaviors requires communication between brain regions, but how neural dynamics are organized to facilitate reliable transmission is not well understood. Here we studied this process directly by generating neural activity that propagates between brain regions and drives behavior, assessing how neural populations in sensory cortex cooperate to transmit information. We achieved this by imaging two densely interconnected regions-the primary and secondary somatosensory cortex (S1 and S2)-in mice while performing two-photon photostimulation of S1 neurons and assigning behavioral salience to the photostimulation. We found that the probability of perception is determined not only by the strength of the photostimulation but also by the variability of S1 neural activity. Therefore, maximizing the signal-to-noise ratio of the stimulus representation in cortex relative to the noise or variability is critical to facilitate activity propagation and perception.

Indexed as

BrainNeuronsAnimalsMiceParietal LobePerceptionPhotons

Identifiers

PMID37640911
PMCPMC10471496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.