Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37640862›Full record

ReviewDrugs in R&D2023

The Benefits and Risks of Switching from Fingolimod to Siponimod for the Treatment of Relapsing-Remitting and Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis.

Martin Vališ, Anat Achiron, Hans Peter Hartung, Jan Mareš, Veronika Tichá, Pavel Štourač, Simona Halusková, Francesco Angelucci, Zbyšek Pavelek

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs in R&D, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Martin VališDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Hradec Králové, Charles University in Prague, Sokolská 581, 500 05, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Anat AchironMultiple Sclerosis Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.
Hans Peter HartungDepartment of Neurology, Medical School, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Jan MarešDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine at Palacký University and University Hospital in Olomouc, I. P. Pavlova 6, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Veronika TicháFirst Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Pavel ŠtouračDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Hradec Králové, Charles University in Prague, Sokolská 581, 500 05, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Simona HaluskováDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Hradec Králové, Charles University in Prague, Sokolská 581, 500 05, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Francesco AngelucciDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Hradec Králové, Charles University in Prague, Sokolská 581, 500 05, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Zbyšek PavelekDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Hradec Králové, Charles University in Prague, Sokolská 581, 500 05, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic. zbysekpavelek@email.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1772-8781
Charles University · CZTel Aviv University · ILThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity Hospital Olomouc · CZ

Funding

Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic Cooperatio ProgramCharles University in Prague, Czech Republic research area NEURgrant projects of the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic FN HK 00179906
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurodegenerative disease that affects the central nervous system (CNS). Currently, MS treatment is limited to several Food and Drug Administration (FDA)- and European Medicines Agency (EMA)-approved medications that slow disease progression by immunomodulatory action. Fingolimod and siponimod have similar mechanisms of action, and consequently, their therapeutic effects may be comparable. However, while fingolimod is mainly used for relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), siponimod, according to EMA label, is recommended for active secondary progressive MS (SPMS). Clinicians and scientists are analysing whether patients can switch from fingolimod to siponimod and identifying the advantages or disadvantages of such a switch from a therapeutic point of view. In this review, we aim to discuss the therapeutic effects of these two drugs and the advantages/disadvantages of switching treatment from fingolimod to siponimod in patients with the most common forms of MS, RRMS and SPMS.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisMultiple Sclerosis, Chronic ProgressiveNeurodegenerative DiseasesAzetidinesBenzyl CompoundsFingolimod HydrochlorideHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsRecurrenceRisk AssessmentAzetidinesBenzyl CompoundsFingolimod HydrochlorideImmunosuppressive Agentssiponimod

Identifiers

PMID37640862
PMCPMC10676342
OpenAlexW4386212010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.