Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37640807›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Estimation of the flow rate of pyrolysis gasoline, ethylene, and propylene in an industrial olefin plant using machine learning approaches.

Jafar Abdi, Golshan Mazloom, Fahimeh Hadavimoghaddam, Abdolhossein Hemmati-Sarapardeh, Seyyed Hamid Esmaeili-Faraj, Akbar Bolhasani, Soroush Karamian, Shahin Hosseini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jafar AbdiFaculty of Chemical and Materials Engineering, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran. Jafar.abdi@shahroodut.ac.ir.
Golshan MazloomDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran.
Fahimeh HadavimoghaddamInstitute of Unconventional Oil & Gas, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing, 163318, Heilongjiang, China.
Abdolhossein Hemmati-SarapardehDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran. hemmati@uk.ac.ir.
Seyyed Hamid Esmaeili-FarajFaculty of Chemical and Materials Engineering, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran.
Akbar BolhasaniResearch and Development Center, Jam Petrochemical Company, Bushehr, 1434853114, Iran.
Soroush KaramianResearch and Development Center, Jam Petrochemical Company, Bushehr, 1434853114, Iran.
Shahin HosseiniResearch and Development Center, Jam Petrochemical Company, Bushehr, 1434853114, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Light olefins, as the backbone of the chemical and petrochemical industries, are produced mainly via steam cracking route. Prediction the of effects of operating variables on the product yield distribution through the mechanistic approaches is complex and requires long time. While increasing in the industrial automation and the availability of the high throughput data, the machine learning approaches have gained much attention due to the simplicity and less required computational efforts. In this study, the potential capability of four powerful machine learning models, i.e., Multilayer perceptron (MLP) neural network, adaptive boosting-support vector regression (AdaBoost-SVR), recurrent neural network (RNN), and deep belief network (DBN) was investigated to predict the product distribution of an olefin plant in industrial scale. In this regard, an extensive data set including 1184 actual data points were gathered during four successive years under various practical conditions. 24 varying independent parameters, including flow rates of different feedstock, numbers of active furnaces, and coil outlet temperatures, were chosen as the input variables of the models and the outputs were the flow rates of the main products, i.e., pyrolysis gasoline, ethylene, and propylene. The accuracy of the models was assessed by different statistical techniques. Based on the obtained results, the RNN model accurately predicted the main product flow rates with average absolute percent relative error (AAPRE) and determination coefficient (R

Identifiers

PMID37640807
PMCPMC10462638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.