Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37640774›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

A new interpretable belief rule base model with step-length convergence strategy for aerospace relay health state assessment.

Xiuxian Yin, Bing Xu, Laihong Hu, Hongyu Li, Wei He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiuxian YinHarbin Normal University, Harbin, 150025, China.
Bing XuHarbin Normal University, Harbin, 150025, China. bingxv_0227@163.com.
Laihong HuRocket Force University of Engineering, Xi'an, 710025, China.
Hongyu LiHarbin Normal University, Harbin, 150025, China. hsdlihy@163.com.
Wei HeHarbin Normal University, Harbin, 150025, China.

Funding

Graduate Academic Innovation Project of Harbin Normal University Grant Nos. HSDSSCX2022-17Graduate Academic Innovation Project of Harbin Normal University HSDSSCX2022-18Graduate Academic Innovation Project of Harbin Normal University HSDSSCX2022-19Natural Science Foundation of China Grant 62203365‬Natural Science Foundation of China Grant 62203461Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China Grant No. LH2021F038Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China Grant No. 2020M683736Teaching Reform Project of Higher Education in Heilongjiang Province Grant Nos. SJGY20210456Teaching Reform Project of Higher Education in Heilongjiang Province SJGY20210457
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health state assessment is an important measure to maintain the safety of aerospace relays. Due to the uncertainty within the relay system, the accuracy of the model assessment is challenged. In addition, the opaqueness of the process and incomprehensibility of the results tend to lose trust in the model, especially in high security fields, so it is crucial to maintain the interpretability of the model. Thus, this paper proposes a new interpretable belief rule base model with step-length convergence strategy (IBRB-Sc) for aerospace relay health state assessment. First, general interpretability criteria for BRB are considered, and strategies for maintaining model interpretability are designed. Second, the evidential reasoning (ER) method is used as the inference machine. Then, optimization is performed based on the Interpretable Projection Covariance Matrix Adaptive Evolution Strategy (IP-CMA-ES). Finally, the validity of the model is verified using the JRC-7M aerospace relay as a case study. Comparative experiments show that the proposed model maintains high accuracy and achieves advantages in interpretability.

Identifiers

PMID37640774
PMCPMC10462728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.