SynthesisEuropean urology oncology2024
Diagnostic Performance of Prostate-specific Antigen Density for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in the Era of Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European urology oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent advances in discriminating prostate cancer from benign prostatic diseases in the pre-biopsy population.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2026Review
- Predicting clinically significant prostate cancer in PI-RADS 3 lesions: an internally validated PSA density-based model with decision-curve analysis.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Value of PSA density in PI-RADS 3 lesions: a single-center retrospective observational study.International urology and nephrology · 2026Observational
- Prostate MRI reporting and its impact on clinical decision-making: the urologists' perspective.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Noninvasive Urine Test Predicts Grade Group Upgrading in Patients on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: Multisite Validation and Comparison with MRI.The Journal of urology · 2026Article
- Apparent diffusion coefficient radiomics for differentiating benign and malignant PI-RADS 3-5 prostate lesions: external validation.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- PSA density for clinically significant prostate cancer detection: a retrospective cohort study on the influence of age and prostate volume.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Zone-Specific PSA Density from AI-Assisted mp-MRI as a Predictor of Prostate Cancer in the PSA 4-20 ng/mL Range.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical significance of MRI PI-RADS 3 lesions upgraded by dynamic contrast enhancement: the "PI-RADS 3 + 1" subgroup.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Intraprostatic PSMA PET/MRI parameters and clinical markers for ISUP prediction and postoperative biochemical recurrence in patients with primary prostate cancer.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Comparative Evaluation of Biological Techniques.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The effects of prostate volume and PI-RADS category on optimal PSA-density thresholds for biopsy decision-making.European radiology · 2026Article
- The Outcome of Immediate Adjuvant Postoperative External Beam Radiotherapy Versus Observation Alone After Radical Prostatectomy in High-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Meta Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Pilot study of dual-arm absolute quantification of miR-130a and miR-365a in plasma and urine reveals 3p/5p strand-ratio shifts in prostate cancer.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Texture analysis enhances diagnostic accuracy of lesions scored as 5 in the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System in magnetic resonance imaging.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2026Article
- Diagnostic value of prostate magnetic resonance imaging in men with prostate-specific antigen levels ≥ 15 ng/mL for biopsy decision-making.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Study on the application value of histogram parameters from reduced field-of-view VOI in rectal cancer.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Value of Transabdominal Ultrasound-based Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Prostate-specific Antigen Density for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.European urology open science · 2026Article
- Risk factors of negative prostate biopsies: A CHAID decision tree analysis.BJUI compass · 2026Article
- Evaluation of large language models in assigning PI-RADS v2.1 categories for prostate MRI reports.BMC urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextThere has been a dramatic increase in the use of prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnostic workup. With prostate volume calculated from MRI, prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) now is a ready-to-use parameter for prostate cancer (PCa) risk stratification before prostate biopsy, especially among patients with negative MRI or equivocal lesions.
objectiveIn this review, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of PSAD for clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPCa) among patients who received MRI before prostate biopsy. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Two investigators performed a systematic review according of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) criteria. Studies (published between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2021) reporting the diagnostic performance (outcomes) of PSAD (intervention) for CSPCa among men who received prebiopsy prostate MRI and subsequent prostate biopsy (patients), using biopsy pathology as the gold standard (comparison), were eligible for inclusion. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 1536 papers were identified in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. Of these, 248 studies were reviewed in detail and 39 were qualified. The pooled sensitivity (SENS) and specificity (SPEC) for diagnosing CSPCa among patients with positive MRI were, respectively, 0.87 and 0.35 for PSAD of 0.1 ng/ml/ml, 0.74 and 0.61 for PSAD of 0.15 ng/ml/ml, and 0.51 and 0.81 for PSAD of 0.2 ng/ml/ml. The pooled SENS and SPEC for diagnosing CSPCa among patients with negative MRI were, respectively, 0.85 and 0.36 for PSAD of 0.1 ng/ml/ml, 0.60 and 0.66 for PSAD of 0.15 ng/ml/ml, and 0.33 and 0.84 for PSAD of 0.2 ng/ml/ml. The pooled SENS and SPEC among patients with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3 or Likert 3 lesions were, respectively, 0.87 and 0.39 for PSAD of 0.1 ng/ml/ml, 0.61 and 0.69 for PSAD of 0.15 ng/ml/ml, and 0.42 and 0.82 for PSAD of 0.2 ng/ml/ml. The post-test probability for CSPCa among patients with negative MRI was 6% if PSAD was <0.15 ng/ml/ml and dropped to 4% if PSAD was <0.10 ng/ml/ml.
conclusionsIn this systematic review, we quantitatively evaluated the diagnosis performance of PSAD for CSPCa in combination with prostate MRI. It demonstrated a complementary performance and predictive value, especially among patients with negative MRI and PI-RADS 3 or Likert 3 lesions. Integration of PSAD into decision-making for prostate biopsy may facilitate improved risk-adjusted care. PATIENT SUMMARY: Prostate-specific antigen density is a ready-to-use parameter in the era of increased magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) use in clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPCa) diagnosis. Findings suggest that the chance of having CSPCa was very low (4% or 6% for those with negative prebiopsy MRI or Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (Likert) score 3 lesion, respectively, if the PSAD was <0.10 ng/ml/ml), which may lower the need for biopsy in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.