Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37640541›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2023

The Role of Genetically Distinct Central Amygdala Neurons in Appetitive and Aversive Responding Assayed with a Novel Dual Valence Operant Conditioning Paradigm.

Mariia Dorofeikova, Claire E Stelly, Anh Duong, Samhita Basavanhalli, Erin Bean, Katherine Weissmuller, Natalia Sifnugel, Alexis Resendez, David M Corey, Jeffrey G Tasker and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mariia DorofeikovaDepartment of Psychology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118.
Claire E StellyDepartment of Psychology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118.
Anh DuongProgram in Neuroscience, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118.
Samhita BasavanhalliProgram in Neuroscience, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118.
Erin BeanProgram in Neuroscience, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118.
Katherine WeissmullerProgram in Neuroscience, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118.
Natalia SifnugelProgram in Neuroscience, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118.
Alexis ResendezDepartment of Psychology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118.
David M CoreyDepartment of Psychology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118.
Jeffrey G TaskerTulane Brain Institute, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118.ORCID 0000-0003-1977-4199
Jonathan P FadokDepartment of Psychology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118 jfadok@tulane.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0608-5151
Tulane University · US

Funding

Neural circuits regulating flight and panic behavior.R01MH122561 · NIMH · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI FADOK, JONATHAN P · 2020 to 2024
$2.4M
BLRD VA I01 BX005118NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH122561
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To survive, animals must meet their biological needs while simultaneously avoiding danger. However, the neurobiological basis of appetitive and aversive survival behaviors has historically been studied using separate behavioral tasks. While recent studies in mice have quantified appetitive and aversive conditioned responses simultaneously (Jikomes et al., 2016; Heinz et al., 2017), these tasks required different behavioral responses to each stimulus. As many brain regions involved in survival behavior process stimuli of opposite valence, we developed a paradigm in which mice perform the same response (nose poke) to distinct auditory cues to obtain a rewarding outcome (palatable food) or avoid an aversive outcome (mild footshoock). This design allows for both within-subject and between-subject comparisons as animals respond to appetitive and aversive cues. The central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) is implicated in the regulation of responses to stimuli of either valence. Considering its role in threat processing (Wilensky et al., 2006; Haubensak et al., 2010) and regulation of incentive salience (Warlow and Berridge, 2021), it is important to examine the contribution of the CeA to mechanisms potentially underlying comorbid dysregulation of avoidance and reward (Sinha, 2008; Bolton et al., 2009). Using this paradigm, we tested the role of two molecularly defined CeA subtypes previously linked to consummatory and defensive behaviors. Significant strain differences in the acquisition and performance of the task were observed. Bidirectional chemogenetic manipulation of CeA somatostatin (SOM) neurons altered motivation for reward and perseveration of reward-seeking responses on avoidance trials. Manipulation of corticotropin-releasing factor neurons (CRF) had no significant effect on food reward consumption, motivation, or task performance. This paradigm will facilitate investigations into the neuronal mechanisms controlling motivated behavior across valences.

Indexed as

Central Amygdaloid NucleusAffectAnimalsConditioning, OperantMiceMotivationNeuronscentral amygdalacorticotropin-releasing factordual valencemiceoperant conditioningsomatostatin

Identifiers

PMID37640541
PMCPMC10488222
OpenAlexW4386212533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.