Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37640290›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2023

mHealth Monitoring of Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Patients: A Community-Based Implementation Study.

Alexandra Cossio, Martha Milena Bautista-Gomez, Neal Alexander, Alejandra María Del Castillo, María Del Mar Castro, Patricia Yaneth Castaño-Grajales, Yeison Hawer Gutiérrez-Poloche, Laura Sofía Zuluaga, Leonardo Vargas-Bernal, Andrés Navarro and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandra CossioCentro Internacional de Entrenamiento e Investigaciones Médicas, Cali, Colombia.
Martha Milena Bautista-GomezCentro Internacional de Entrenamiento e Investigaciones Médicas, Cali, Colombia.
Neal AlexanderCentro Internacional de Entrenamiento e Investigaciones Médicas, Cali, Colombia.
Alejandra María Del CastilloCentro Internacional de Entrenamiento e Investigaciones Médicas, Cali, Colombia.
María Del Mar CastroCentro Internacional de Entrenamiento e Investigaciones Médicas, Cali, Colombia.
Patricia Yaneth Castaño-GrajalesCentro Internacional de Entrenamiento e Investigaciones Médicas, Cali, Colombia.
Yeison Hawer Gutiérrez-PolocheCentro Internacional de Entrenamiento e Investigaciones Médicas, Cali, Colombia.
Laura Sofía ZuluagaCentro Internacional de Entrenamiento e Investigaciones Médicas, Cali, Colombia.
Leonardo Vargas-BernalUniversidad Icesi, Grupo i2t, Cali, Colombia.
Andrés NavarroUniversidad Icesi, Grupo i2t, Cali, Colombia.
Nancy Gore SaraviaCentro Internacional de Entrenamiento e Investigaciones Médicas, Cali, Colombia.
Centro Internacional de Entrenamiento e Investigaciones Medicas · COIcesi University · CO

Funding

Vector/Host-Parasite Interface of Leishmaniasis in ColombiaD43TW006589 · FIC · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GORE SARAVIA, NANCY, TSCHUDI, CHRISTIAN · 2003 to 2024
$4.3M
The Innate Immune Response As A Therapeutic Target For Cutaneous LeishmaniasisU19AI129910 · NIAID · CENTRO INTERNACIONAL (CIDEIM) · PI GOMEZ, MARIA ADELAIDA · 2017 to 2021
$2.8M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW006589NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI129910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) remains a global health problem. Compelled by the protracted healing process, initial and final outcomes of treatment are determined at 90 and 180 days, respectively, after initiation of treatment. Loss to follow-up during these intervals is substantial. Consequently, the effectiveness of treatment is largely unknown. We conducted an effectiveness-implementation hybrid design study of a community-based mobile health (mHealth) strategy to monitor adherence to anti-leishmanial treatment, adverse drug reactions, and therapeutic response compared with standard of care in two rural communities of Colombia. Three implementation outcomes were evaluated: usability and acceptability by qualitative methods and fidelity using quantitative methods. Fifty-seven patients were prospectively included in the mHealth intervention and 48 in the standard-of-care group. In addition, 24 community health leaders (CHLs), health workers, and patients participated in qualitative evaluations. The intervention significantly increased the proportion of patients having follow-up of therapeutic outcomes 90 and 180 days after initiating treatment from 4.2% (standard of care) to 82.5% (intervention), P < 0.001. The proportion of patients having records of treatment adherence, adverse drug reactions, and therapeutic response also increased significantly (P < 0.001). Fidelity to the intervention (recording of treatment adherence, adverse drug reactions, lesion photographs, and evaluation of therapeutic response) was 70-100%. The app was highly accepted by CHLs, health workers, and patients, who perceived that the app improved case identification and follow-up and met a public health need. Although usability was high, low connectivity affected real-time transmission of data. This community-based mHealth strategy facilitated access to health care for CL in rural areas and knowledge of treatment effectiveness.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsLeishmaniasis, CutaneousTelemedicineDelivery of Health CareHumansTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID37640290
PMCPMC10551068
OpenAlexW4386211867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.