ArticleJournal of affective disorders2023
In-person versus remote CBT groups during COVID-19 for adolescents with mood disorders or psychosis-risk syndromes.
Article in Journal of affective disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSince the COVID-19 pandemic, psychosocial therapies have been provided in varying formats, including remote, in-person, and hybrid services. It is unclear whether varying formats are similarly efficacious in improving psychiatric symptoms and functioning, lead to similar rates of treatment retention, and are equally acceptable to patients. This study compared youth with mood disorders and/or psychosis-risk syndromes who participated in a group cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in-person prior to COVID-19, to youth in the same treatment given remotely during the pandemic.
methodsAdolescents ages 13-17 years participated in 9 sessions of group-based CBT given in-person (2018-2019) or remotely (2020-2021). Youth participants provided self-report ratings of psychiatric symptoms, psychosocial functioning, and emotional regulation at the study baseline and post-treatment and ratings of treatment satisfaction and burden at post-treatment.
resultsThere were no differences between in-person and remote treatment improvements in psychiatric symptoms, psychosocial functioning or emotional regulation. However, youth in remote treatment had increased retention compared to youth who received treatment in person. Youth in the remote treatment reported similar levels of satisfaction but reported lower burden compared to those who received in-person treatment. LIMITATIONS: Participants were not randomized into remote or in-person treatment. Participants prior to COVID did not have the same frame of reference for alternative treatment delivery options as those during or post-COVID.
conclusionsRemote group treatment can provide similar levels of psychiatric benefit but less burden than in-person treatment for youth with mood disorders and/or psychosis-risk syndromes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.