Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37639648›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2023

Biochemical Recurrence Surrogacy for Clinical Outcomes After Radiotherapy for Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate.

Soumyajit Roy, Tahmineh Romero, Jeff M Michalski, Felix Y Feng, Jason A Efstathiou, Colleen A F Lawton, Michel Bolla, Philippe Maingon, Theo de Reijke, David Joseph and 33 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Relationship between [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The contemporary management of prostate cancer.CA: a cancer journal for clinicians
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

43 authors at 20 institutions in 7 countries.

Soumyajit RoyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.ORCID 0000-0001-6617-5522
Tahmineh RomeroDepartment of Medicine Statistics Core, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
Jeff M MichalskiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St Louis, MO.ORCID 0000-0003-0563-3766
Felix Y FengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-0963-7687
Jason A EfstathiouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0003-0996-0350
Colleen A F LawtonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.
Michel BollaRadiotherapy Department, University Hospital, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1727-8773
Philippe MaingonDepartment of Oncology, Hematology, and Supportive Care, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5364-9979
Theo de ReijkeDepartment of Urology, Prostate Cancer Network in the Netherlands, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
David JosephDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Wee Loon OngAlfred Health Radiation Oncology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6657-7193
Matthew R SydesMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9323-1371
David P DearnaleyDivision of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research and Department of Urology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3954-2806
Alison C TreeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.ORCID 0000-0002-5033-424X
Nathalie CarrierClinical Research Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Abdenour NabidDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1102-6751
Luis SouhamiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Luca IncrocciDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9994-763X
Wilma D HeemsbergenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2144-0729
Floris J PosDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0903-4149
Almudena ZapateroHospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2930-2312
Araceli GuerreroHospital Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Ana AlvarezHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5388-5848
Carmen Gonzalez San-SegundoHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Xavier MaldonadoHospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Robert E ReiterDepartment of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-2654-1628
Matthew B RettigDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-7394-3056
Nicholas G NickolsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
Michael L SteinbergDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-4292-5824
Luca F ValleDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-5781-4174
T Martin MaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.ORCID 0000-0002-0053-7874
Matthew J FarrellDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.ORCID 0000-0003-4810-6253
Beth K NeilsenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-4859-6486
Jesus E JuarezDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-9604-992X
Jie DengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.ORCID 0000-0003-0249-1969
Sitaram VangalaDepartment of Medicine Statistics Core, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
Norbert AvrilDepartment of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.
Angela Y JiaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH.ORCID 0000-0002-0812-2614
Nicholas G ZaorskyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH.ORCID 0000-0002-4932-1986
Yilun SunDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH.ORCID 0000-0002-1341-382X
Daniel SprattDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH.ORCID 0000-0002-5973-4741
Amar U KishanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-7437-6591
Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials in Cancer of the Prostate (MARCAP) Consortium Investigators
University of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center · USCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke · CAErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESUniversity of Washington · USAlfred Health · AUAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLCase Western Reserve University · USHarvard University · USHospital Universitario de La Princesa · ESHospital Universitario Son Espases · ESMcGill University Health Centre · CAMedical College of Wisconsin · USMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL · GBRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBRush University Medical Center · USSorbonne Université · FRThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLThe University of Western Australia · AU

Funding

Integrative Cancer Scholars Training GrantT32CA009213 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI CAREW, JENNIFER S, CURIEL-LEWANDROWSKI, CLARA · 1985 to 2024
$8.6M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA009213NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009213
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe surrogacy of biochemical recurrence (BCR) for overall survival (OS) in localized prostate cancer remains controversial. Herein, we evaluate the surrogacy of BCR using different surrogacy analytic methods. MATERIALS AND

methodsIndividual patient data from 11 trials evaluating radiotherapy dose escalation, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) use, and ADT prolongation were obtained. Surrogate candidacy was assessed using the Prentice criteria (including landmark analyses) and the two-stage meta-analytic approach (estimating Kendall's tau and the

resultsOverall, 10,741 patients were included. Dose escalation, addition of short-term ADT, and prolongation of ADT duration significantly improved BCR (hazard ratio [HR], 0.71 [95% CI, 0.63 to 0.79]; HR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.48 to 0.59]; and HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.48 to 0.61], respectively). Adding short-term ADT (HR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.84 to 0.99]) and prolonging ADT (HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.78 to 0.94]) significantly improved OS, whereas dose escalation did not (HR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.87 to 1.11]). BCR at 48 months was associated with inferior OS in all three groups (HR, 2.46 [95% CI, 2.08 to 2.92]; HR, 1.51 [95% CI, 1.35 to 1.70]; and HR, 2.31 [95% CI, 2.04 to 2.61], respectively). However, after adjusting for BCR at 48 months, there was no significant treatment effect on OS (HR, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.96 to 1.27]; HR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.87 to 1.06] and 1.00 [95% CI, 0.90 to 1.12], respectively). The patient-level correlation (Kendall's tau) for BCRFS and OS ranged between 0.59 and 0.69, and that for TTBCR and OS ranged between 0.23 and 0.41. The

conclusionBCRFS and TTBCR are prognostic but failed to satisfy all surrogacy criteria. Strength of correlation was greater when noncancer-related deaths were considered events.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaProstatic NeoplasmsAndrogen AntagonistsHumansMaleProstateProstate-Specific AntigenAndrogen AntagonistsProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID37639648
PMCPMC10642893
OpenAlexW4386211636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.