Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37639638›Full record

ReviewCurrent protocols2023

Perspectives on the Drosophila melanogaster Model for Advances in Toxicological Science.

Matthew D Rand, Jason M Tennessen, Trudy F C Mackay, Robert R H Anholt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Fly · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Phytochemical Analysis and Bioevaluation ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Exposure to perfluorooctanoic acid acceleratesbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Chemical Profile and Bioinsecticidal Nanoemulsion ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Conserved Molecular Responses to Arsenite Exposure inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  11. Characterization ofToxins · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Medical science pulse · 2025
    Article
  15. Arsenic toxicity in theFrontiers in toxicology · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthew D RandDepartment of Environmental Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York.
Jason M TennessenDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.
Trudy F C MackayCenter for Human Genetics and Department of Genetics and Biochemistry, Clemson University, Greenwood, South Carolina.
Robert R H AnholtCenter for Human Genetics and Department of Genetics and Biochemistry, Clemson University, Greenwood, South Carolina.

Funding

VISUAL INDICES OF NEUROTOXICITYP30ES001247 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Martha Susiarjo · 1985 to 2026
$42.8M
Quality Assurance and Quality Control Project Management: Improving Submissions and Study Conduct in the Human Subjects Research Prior Approval ProcessUL1TR002529 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI MOE, SHARON M, WIEHE, SARAH ELIZABETH · 2018 to 2022
$27.2M
Training in Environment ToxicologyT32ES007026 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Alison Elder, Marissa Sobolewski Terry · 1985 to 2026
$20.2M
Statistical Methods for Gene Regulatory Analysis From Single Cell Genomics DataP20GM139769 · NIGMS · CLEMSON UNIVERSITY · PI ANHOLT, ROBERT R. H, ARNO, GAVIN · 2021 to 2025
$10.8M
Reverse Engineering Quantitative Genetic VariationR01GM128974 · NIGMS · CLEMSON UNIVERSITY · PI ANHOLT, ROBERT R. H, MACKAY, TRUDY F. · 2018 to 2021
$1.9M
Mechanisms of Methylmercury Toxicity in Neuromuscular DevelopmentR01ES025721 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI RAND, MATTHEW D · 2016 to 2020
$1.7M
Microbial mechanisms of methylmercury metabolism in humansR01ES030940 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI RAND, MATTHEW D · 2019 to 2021
$1.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002529NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES001247NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES025721NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES030940NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007026NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM139769NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM128974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of Drosophila melanogaster for studies of toxicology has grown considerably in the last decade. The Drosophila model has long been appreciated as a versatile and powerful model for developmental biology and genetics because of its ease of handling, short life cycle, low cost of maintenance, molecular genetic accessibility, and availability of a wide range of publicly available strains and data resources. These features, together with recent unique developments in genomics and metabolomics, make the fly model especially relevant and timely for the development of new approach methodologies and movements toward precision toxicology. Here, we offer a perspective on how flies can be leveraged to identify risk factors relevant to environmental exposures and human health. First, we review and discuss fundamental toxicologic principles for experimental design with Drosophila. Next, we describe quantitative and systems genetics approaches to resolve the genetic architecture and candidate pathways controlling susceptibility to toxicants. Finally, we summarize the current state and future promise of the emerging field of Drosophila metabolomics for elaborating toxic mechanisms. © 2023 The Authors. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Indexed as

DrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterAnimalsEnvironmental ExposureGenomicsHumansDrosophilagenomicsmetabolomicstoxicodynamicstoxicokinetics

Identifiers

PMID37639638
PMCPMC10463236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.