Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37639595›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

Highly restricted near-surface permafrost extent during the mid-Pliocene warm period.

Donglin Guo, Huijun Wang, Vladimir E Romanovsky, Alan M Haywood, Nick Pepin, Ulrich Salzmann, Jianqi Sun, Qing Yan, Zhongshi Zhang, Xiangyu Li and 15 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 17 institutions in 10 countries.

Donglin GuoNansen-Zhu International Research Centre, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China.
Huijun WangKey Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education/Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China.
Vladimir E RomanovskyGeophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775.ORCID 0000-0002-9515-2087
Alan M HaywoodSchool of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7008-0534
Nick PepinSchool of Environment, Geography and Geosciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 3HE, United Kingdom.
Ulrich SalzmannDepartment of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5598-5327
Jianqi SunNansen-Zhu International Research Centre, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China.
Qing YanNansen-Zhu International Research Centre, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5299-7824
Zhongshi ZhangDepartment of Atmospheric Science, School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geoscience, Wuhan 430074, China.
Xiangyu LiDepartment of Atmospheric Science, School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geoscience, Wuhan 430074, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7724-4025
Bette L Otto-BliesnerClimate and Global Dynamics Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80307.ORCID 0000-0003-1911-1598
Ran FengDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269.
Gerrit LohmannAlfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven 27570, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2089-733X
Christian StepanekAlfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven 27570, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3912-6271
Ayako Abe-OuchiAtmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, University of Tokyo, Kashiwa 277-8568, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1745-5952
Wing-Le ChanAtmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, University of Tokyo, Kashiwa 277-8568, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5646-6104
W Richard PeltierDepartment of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto M5S 1A7, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5555-7661
Deepak ChandanDepartment of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto M5S 1A7, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0756-754X
Anna S von der HeydtInstitute for Marine and Atmospheric Research Utrecht, Department of Physics, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CC, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5557-3282
Camille ContouxLaboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement/Institut Pierre Simon Laplace, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique-Université de Versailles Saint Quentin, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette 91191, France.
Mark A ChandlerCenter for Climate Systems Research, Columbia University, New York, NY 10025.ORCID 0000-0002-6548-227X
Ning TanKey Laboratory of Cenozoic Geology and Environment, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China.
Qiong ZhangDepartment of Physical Geography and Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm 10691, Sweden.
Stephen J HunterSchool of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
Youichi KamaeFaculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8572, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0461-5718
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNAlfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung · DEChina University of Geosciences · CNThe University of Tokyo · JPUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Toronto · CAGoddard Institute for Space Studies · USNanjing University of Information Science and Technology · CNNorthumbria University · GBNSF National Center for Atmospheric Research · USStockholm University · SEUniversité Paris-Saclay · FRUniversity of Alaska Fairbanks · USUniversity of Connecticut · USUniversity of Portsmouth · GBUniversity of Tsukuba · JPUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate understanding of permafrost dynamics is critical for evaluating and mitigating impacts that may arise as permafrost degrades in the future; however, existing projections have large uncertainties. Studies of how permafrost responded historically during Earth's past warm periods are helpful in exploring potential future permafrost behavior and to evaluate the uncertainty of future permafrost change projections. Here, we combine a surface frost index model with outputs from the second phase of the Pliocene Model Intercomparison Project to simulate the near-surface (~3 to 4 m depth) permafrost state in the Northern Hemisphere during the mid-Pliocene warm period (mPWP, ~3.264 to 3.025 Ma). This period shares similarities with the projected future climate. Constrained by proxy-based surface air temperature records, our simulations demonstrate that near-surface permafrost was highly spatially restricted during the mPWP and was 93 ± 3% smaller than the preindustrial extent. Near-surface permafrost was present only in the eastern Siberian uplands, Canadian high Arctic Archipelago, and northernmost Greenland. The simulations are similar to near-surface permafrost changes projected for the end of this century under the SSP5-8.5 scenario and provide a perspective on the potential permafrost behavior that may be expected in a warmer world.

Identifiers

PMID37639595
PMCPMC10483645
OpenAlexW4386211822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.