Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37639437›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

The pathophysiological impact of intra-abdominal hypertension in pigs.

Robert Wise, Reitze Rodseth, Ester Párraga-Ros, Rafael Latorre, Octavio López Albors, Laura Correa-Martín, Francisco M Sánchez-Margallo, Irma Eugenia Candanosa-Aranda, Jan Poelaert, Gregorio Castellanos and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Robert WiseFaculty Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5237-5582
Reitze RodsethDiscipline of Anaesthesiology, and Critical Care, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Ester Párraga-RosDepartment of Anatomy and Comparative Pathology, Veterinary Faculty, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Rafael LatorreDepartment of Anatomy and Comparative Pathology, Veterinary Faculty, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Octavio López AlborsDepartment of Anatomy and Comparative Pathology, Veterinary Faculty, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Laura Correa-MartínLaparoscopy Department Jesus Uson Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre, Caceres, Spain.
Francisco M Sánchez-MargalloLaparoscopy Department Jesus Uson Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre, Caceres, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2138-988X
Irma Eugenia Candanosa-ArandaHighlands Teaching and Research Farm, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Queretaro. Mexico.
Jan PoelaertFaculty Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0065-2899
Gregorio CastellanosDepartment of General Surgery, Virgen de la Arrixaca General University Hospital, Murcia, Spain.
Manu L N G MalbrainFirst Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Universidad de Murcia · ESCentro de Cirugía de Mínima Invasión Jesús Usón · ESVrije Universiteit Brussel · BEHospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca · ESMedical University of Lublin · PLUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome are common with clinically significant consequences. We investigated the pathophysiological effects of raised IAP as part of a more extensive exploratory animal study. The study design included both pneumoperitoneum and mechanical intestinal obstruction models.

methodsForty-nine female swine were divided into six groups: a control group (Cr; n = 5), three pneumoperitoneum groups with IAPs of 20mmHg (Pn20; n = 10), 30mmHg (Pn30; n = 10), 40mmHg (Pn40; n = 10), and two mechanical intestinal occlusion groups with IAPs of 20mmHg (MIO20; n = 9) and 30mmHg (MIO30; n = 5).

resultsThere were significant changes (p<0.05) noted in all organ systems, most notably systolic blood pressure (SBP) (p<0.001), cardiac index (CI) (p = 0.003), stroke volume index (SVI) (p<0.001), mean pulmonary airway pressure (MPP) (p<0.001), compliance (p<0.001), pO2 (p = 0.003), bicarbonate (p = 0.041), hemoglobin (p = 0.012), lipase (p = 0.041), total bilirubin (p = 0.041), gastric pH (p<0.001), calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (p<0.001), and urine output (p<0.001). SVV increased progressively as the IAP increased with no obvious changes in intravascular volume status. There were no significant differences between the models regarding their impact on cardiovascular, respiratory, renal and gastrointestinal systems. However, significant differences were noted between the two models at 30mmHg, with MIO30 showing worse metabolic and hematological parameters, and Pn30 and Pn40 showing a more rapid rise in creatinine.

conclusionsThis study identified and quantified the impact of intra-abdominal hypertension at different pressures on several organ systems and highlighted the significance of even short-lived elevations. Two models of intra-abdominal pressure were used, with a mechanical obstruction model showing more rapid changes in metabolic and haematological changes. These may represent different underlying cellular and vascular pathophysiological processes, but this remains unclear.

Indexed as

Intra-Abdominal HypertensionPneumoperitoneumAnimalsBicarbonatesBilirubinControl GroupsFemaleSwineBicarbonatesBilirubin

Identifiers

PMID37639437
PMCPMC10461824
OpenAlexW4386215532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.